2014
DOI: 10.3329/jasbs.v40i2.46026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate Specific Zooperiphyton And Their Relationships With Water Quality Parameters In Dhanmondi Lake Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract: In the present investigation, zooperiphyton communities comprised protozoa, rotifera copepoda, cladocera, ostracoda, conchostraca, insect’s larvae, oligochaeta, nematoda and mollusca. The group of zooperiphyton on three substrates showed no significant differences (P>0.05). Rotifers and protozoans were the most dominant group of total zooperiphyton abundance among three substrates. The interrelationships between zooperiphyton groups and physicochemical features of water as well as among different groups of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the findings of this study with other studies on other lakes in the city (Table 3), we get a mixed-up scenario. The hardness of this lake is comparable to that of Dhanmondi Lake and is comparatively lower than other lakes [19]. Similar is the case with TDS [19,20].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the findings of this study with other studies on other lakes in the city (Table 3), we get a mixed-up scenario. The hardness of this lake is comparable to that of Dhanmondi Lake and is comparatively lower than other lakes [19]. Similar is the case with TDS [19,20].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The hardness of this lake is comparable to that of Dhanmondi Lake and is comparatively lower than other lakes [19]. Similar is the case with TDS [19,20]. However, the water contains far more suspended solids than other water bodies, as suggested by the high TSS, with a standard deviation of 100.837.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%