2003
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2003.821822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate removal and BOX thinning effects on total dose response of FDSOI NMOSFET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its TID response is not intrinsically as good as for bulk technology but may be strongly improved using various hardening techniques including either the use appropriate SOI substrates option [13], [14] (substrate removal, thin BOX with or without ground plane implants) associated to back-biasing techniques or using a relaxed geometry [24]. Furthermore, the complete dielectric isolation between devices combined with the reduced active silicon volume inherent to this technology appear as clear advantages if SEE tolerance is needed.…”
Section: B Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its TID response is not intrinsically as good as for bulk technology but may be strongly improved using various hardening techniques including either the use appropriate SOI substrates option [13], [14] (substrate removal, thin BOX with or without ground plane implants) associated to back-biasing techniques or using a relaxed geometry [24]. Furthermore, the complete dielectric isolation between devices combined with the reduced active silicon volume inherent to this technology appear as clear advantages if SEE tolerance is needed.…”
Section: B Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nFET drive strength increases while the pFET drive strength decreases with an increase in wafer bias. This is because the BOX/SOI interface is capacitively coupled to the front thin-oxide/SOI interface [11]. The change in transistor drive current observed at positive substrate bias voltages is analogous to the effect of the positive charge induced by ionizing radiation and trapped in the BOX [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During irradiation, the circuit was biased so that VDD was at 1.5 V, ground at 0 V and the input of the inverter chain was at 0 V. In this condition, every other CMOS inverter has an nFET and a pFET that is off state. Ionizing radiation effects are worst for this bias condition for this FDSOI technology [11].…”
Section: Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Synergy between radiation and electrical stresses happens because of the presence of physically damaged regions left by irradiation, as we proposed in the case of bulk CMOS [6]. In parallel, radiation damage on deep-submicron SOI devices Manuscript with ultra-thin gate oxides has been recently investigated after X-ray [7], [8] and proton exposure [9]- [11]. Yet, the reaction of irradiated SOI devices fabricated in a contemporary CMOS technology to subsequent accelerated electrical stresses is still a virgin chapter in the radiation effects field, at least concerning high LET particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%