2017
DOI: 10.3390/s17071530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate Oxide Layer Thickness Optimization for a Dual-Width Plasmonic Grating for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) Biosensor Applications

Abstract: This work investigates a new design for a plasmonic SERS biosensor via computational electromagnetic models. It utilizes a dual-width plasmonic grating design, which has two different metallic widths per grating period. These types of plasmonic gratings have shown larger optical enhancement than standard single-width gratings. The new structures have additional increased enhancement when the spacing between the metal decreases to sub-10 nm dimensions. This work integrates an oxide layer to improve the enhancem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for this paper we took the opposite approach; we focused on the desired wavelength and swept the structure dimensions and the incident angle. Several applications, such as optical filters [ 7 , 8 ], optical communications [ 9 , 10 ], surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) [ 11 ], photodetectors [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], and biosensors [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] could utilize these anomalies and surface plasmon phenomena to improve their performance. This study could provide dual benefits, depending on the application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for this paper we took the opposite approach; we focused on the desired wavelength and swept the structure dimensions and the incident angle. Several applications, such as optical filters [ 7 , 8 ], optical communications [ 9 , 10 ], surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) [ 11 ], photodetectors [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], and biosensors [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] could utilize these anomalies and surface plasmon phenomena to improve their performance. This study could provide dual benefits, depending on the application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, more intense electric fields will interact with individual molecules, producing a much greater scattering signal than for non-optimized geometries. Previous studies have analyzed the electric field in only specific regions of the structure or studied the reflectance/transmittance of the light [ 18 , 19 ]. To have a more complete picture of the SERS enhancement of nanograting structures, the near-field must be studied across the entire surface because molecules from which the signal is scattered do not reside solely in gap regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current computational methods for probing plasmonic structures includes, but is not limited to, finite difference time domain (FDTD), discrete dipole approximation (DDA), and finite element method (FEM), the latter of which was the method used in this study [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Line averages across the surface of the substrate were used to gain a better insight into the electric field enhancement across the entire surface as opposed to the integration regions studied in previous papers [ 18 , 23 ]. For this structure to demonstrate practical SERS biosensor molecular detection capabilities, it must be able to sense molecules in regions that are not only between the nanowires, where the highest enhancement occurs, but also spread out across the entire surface of the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational electromagnetic methods are often used to study theoretical SERS responses of different nanostructures, making use of techniques such as finite-difference time domain (FDTD), finite element method (FEM), and discrete dipole approximation (DDA) [14][15][16]. Prior studies have primarily investigated the nanogaps between the structures and not the complete surface of the gratings [17,18]. This gap-field-only method presents an idealized data set that only accounts for light through the strongest of enhanced electrical fields and does not give a full representation of enhancement across the entire grating pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%