“…The reasonable explanation is that it is difficult for HMF to adsorb on NiO, while the adsorption of HMF on the Pt site is too strong. The Ni in Pt x Ni 100−x NWs could reduce the binding energy of Pt and therefore modulate the adsorption behavior of HMF during HMFOR, giving rise to optimal adsorption energy.The open circuit potential (OCP), which exhibits the variation of absorbates in the Helmholtz layer, was measured to investigate the adsorption behavior of HMF 41,42. When the HMF was injected into the electrolyte, the decreased OCP on the Pt electrode, NiO, and Pt 26 Ni 74 NWs was 0.64, 0.25, and 0.33 V, respectively, revealing the order of HMF absorption strength is as follows: Pt > Pt 26 Ni 74 NWs > NiO (Figure 3d).…”