2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate limitation of a habitat-forming genus Fucus under different water clarity scenarios in the northern Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1) and strong wave forcing, which probably enhances the mixing of water in the coastal areas. Moreover, as the open-sea areas of the Gulf of Bothnia are well oxygenated due to a lack of halocline and topographical isolation of GoB from the Baltic Proper (by the sill between these basins) (Leppäranta and Myrberg, 2009), hypoxic water is not advected from the open sea to the coastal areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1) and strong wave forcing, which probably enhances the mixing of water in the coastal areas. Moreover, as the open-sea areas of the Gulf of Bothnia are well oxygenated due to a lack of halocline and topographical isolation of GoB from the Baltic Proper (by the sill between these basins) (Leppäranta and Myrberg, 2009), hypoxic water is not advected from the open sea to the coastal areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our study suggests, topographically prone areas to deoxygenation represent less than 25 % of seascapes. However, most of the underwater nature values in the Finnish sea areas are concentrated on relatively shallow areas where there exist enough light and suitable substrates (Virtanen et al, 2018;Lappalainen et al, 2019). Shallow areas also suffer from eutrophication and rising temperatures due to changing climate, and are most probably the ones that are particularly susceptible to hypoxia in the future (Breitburg et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussion (1200)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The canopy‐forming macroalgae are key ecosystem engineers within the marine coastal zone, providing habitats for many invertebrates including Littorina species. Although the mass of the canopy and the distribution pattern of intertidal fucoids are affected in a complex manner by a number of both abiotic (e.g., wave action) and biotic (e.g., presence of herbivores) factors (e.g., Jonsson et al., 2006 ; Lappalainen et al., 2019 ), only the distribution pattern of macroalgae, as the most proximate factor, was used as a proxy to determine the intertidal zonation, which was similar in two sites studied. We followed the generalized zonation scheme of Stephenson and Stephenson ( 1949 , 1972 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%