1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(98)00961-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate/layer relationships in II–VIs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alloy systems where such properties are similar over the binary composition range are particularly attractive, although heterostructures with relatively large deviations in lattice dimensions have manifested surprisingly good behavior. Thus, ZnTe on (1 0 0) GaAs substrate with 7% mismatch ratio makes little difference to less deviated systems, at least for ZnTe layers greater than the critical pseudomorphic thickness, while a twice as much mismatch of 14% between CdTe and GaAs does not prevent a clear orientation of the overlayer with respect to the substrate [3][4][5]. We may note also the successful growth of CdTe crystals on layered NbSe 2 in spite of a mismatch ratio as large as 33% [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alloy systems where such properties are similar over the binary composition range are particularly attractive, although heterostructures with relatively large deviations in lattice dimensions have manifested surprisingly good behavior. Thus, ZnTe on (1 0 0) GaAs substrate with 7% mismatch ratio makes little difference to less deviated systems, at least for ZnTe layers greater than the critical pseudomorphic thickness, while a twice as much mismatch of 14% between CdTe and GaAs does not prevent a clear orientation of the overlayer with respect to the substrate [3][4][5]. We may note also the successful growth of CdTe crystals on layered NbSe 2 in spite of a mismatch ratio as large as 33% [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Various approaches have been addressed to II-VI epitaxial growth, focused mainly in epitaxy on III-V or nonpolar substrates (such as Si and Al 2 O 3 ), due to the relatively poor quality of II-VI substrates [4,5]. The fabrication of heterojunctions has been dominated by the availability of suitable substrates and the ability of growth, on account of the lattice parameter match as well as the match in band gap energy, electron affinity and thermal expansion coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This heteroepitaxial structure has a lattice mismatch, differences in the thermal expansion coefficients, and different chemical properties. These aspects may detrimentally affect the crystallinity due to crystal defects generated at the interface [6,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential applications of II-VI semiconductor compounds in optoelectronics have driven an extensive and successful effort to grow CdTe on various substrates [1]. This semiconductor compound is well recognized as a good solar cell absorber layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%