2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.121409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate interactions with suspended and supported monolayerMoS2: Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

13
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
13
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The label "Bulk lattice parameter" indicates that the experimental bulk unit cell [15] was used, i.e., a = 3.160Å and a = 3.153Å for MoS 2 and WS 2 , respectively. The first strain value is actually the unit cell as relaxed with PBE + D2 while for the second strain value of MoS 2 we increased unit cell to a = 3.26Å as found by Jin et al [16].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The label "Bulk lattice parameter" indicates that the experimental bulk unit cell [15] was used, i.e., a = 3.160Å and a = 3.153Å for MoS 2 and WS 2 , respectively. The first strain value is actually the unit cell as relaxed with PBE + D2 while for the second strain value of MoS 2 we increased unit cell to a = 3.26Å as found by Jin et al [16].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A clear kink in the conductivity would thus indicate a relaxation of the lattice as described by Jin et al in Ref. [16].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that this energy resolution is the same as typical momentum microscopy measurements performed with synchrotron radiation and reported to date [8]. Compared to the experimental conditions of the work of Jin et al [8], the off-normal illumination used here enhances the intensity at the point through favorable transition probability from the out-of-plane Mo 4d 2 z orbitals, which is crucial for a direct analysis of the energy dispersion curves [17]. A careful calibration of the k-space scale was performed by measuring with identical PEEM settings as applied for the MoS 2 sample the known reciprocal lattice distances of a freshly prepared Cu(111) single-crystal surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…While the reason for this inconsistency is not clear, note that these DFT calculations mentioned above assumed commensurability between Gr and MoS 2 , which may not exactly be the case in experiment. Also, we note the presence of the n-doped Si substrate in our experiment which is not taken into account in either of the theoretical reports; the effect of the Si substrate on MoS 2 , however, is expected to be weak based on a previous report [11,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The weak electron coupling at the interface of vdW heterostructures offers the possibility of combining the intrinsic electronic properties of the individual 2D layers. In particular, Gr/MoS 2 vdW heterostructures are remarkable because of the high carrier mobility [9] and broadband absorption [10] of graphene, as well as the direct bandgap [11][12][13] and extremely strong light-matter interactions [14] of monolayer MoS 2 . The combination of these unusual characteristics has led to potential applications in field-effect transistor devices [15,16], energy harvesting materials [17,18], and memory cells [19,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%