2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1567-1739(02)00065-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate and pretreatment dependence of Cu nucleation by metal–organic chemical vapor deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,[44][45][46] The effect of the VTMS inhibitor on copper growth is very distinct from that of NH 3 on growth of HfB 2 on SiO 2 from Hf(BH 4 ) 4 , in which the density of nuclei increased continuously with time. 18 Evidently, in the latter system, nucleation is not directed by surface defects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27,[44][45][46] The effect of the VTMS inhibitor on copper growth is very distinct from that of NH 3 on growth of HfB 2 on SiO 2 from Hf(BH 4 ) 4 , in which the density of nuclei increased continuously with time. 18 Evidently, in the latter system, nucleation is not directed by surface defects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We cannot deduce from the present data what factor(s) control the absolute density of Cu islands on the air-exposed Ru surface, but it is possible that a pre-existing density of surface defects, which may be a function of the surface preparation, accounts for the observed island density. 27,[44][45][46] The effect of the VTMS inhibitor on copper growth is very distinct from that of NH 3 on growth of HfB 2 on SiO 2 from Hf(BH 4 ) 4 , in which the density of nuclei increased continuously with time. 18 Evidently, in the latter system, nucleation is not directed by surface defects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the activation barrier for the disproportionation reaction is high on SiO 2 and CDO compared to that on metals or semiconductors because conductive surfaces catalyze the reaction via charge exchange. 31 Thus Cu(hfac) on a metallic surface (air-exposed Ru or Cu) will disproportionate at a finite rate to afford Cu metal, 32 whereas on insulating surfaces (SiO 2 or CDO), Cu(hfac) will predominantly recombine with the VTMS inhibitor and desorb as Cu(hfac)VTMS. This huge difference in kinetic rates then affords selective growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%