2014
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201311096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate Activity Screening with Kinases: Discovery of Small‐Molecule Substrate‐Competitive c‐Src Inhibitors

Abstract: Substrate-competitive kinase inhibitors represent a promising class of kinase inhibitors, however, there is no methodology to selectively identify this type of inhibitor. Herein, we report the application of substrate activity screening to tyrosine kinases. Using this methodology, we have discovered the first small molecule substrates for any protein kinase and the first substrate-competitive inhibitors of c-Src with activity in both biochemical and cellular assays. Characterization of our lead inhibitor demon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluorinating the selected substrate afforded the initial tetrafluorophenol inhibitor. Its further optimization resulted in a substrate‐competitive inhibitor of c‐Src (compound 7 , K i =16 μ m ) …”
Section: Sas Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fluorinating the selected substrate afforded the initial tetrafluorophenol inhibitor. Its further optimization resulted in a substrate‐competitive inhibitor of c‐Src (compound 7 , K i =16 μ m ) …”
Section: Sas Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although this, as mentioned, is interesting from a time/cost efficiency perspective, it can also be expected that related or homologous enzymes may return identical substrate “hits” . Partially addressing these issues, more recent studies have used hierarchical, 2D extended connectivity analysis to guide library design, and this has been shown to have potential for the domain . On the other hand, systematically implementing structure‐based design during the substrate or inhibitor optimization process has not only the potential to facilitate the optimization process, but also to resolve selectivity issues …”
Section: Substrate Library Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have successfully used this approach for the identification of selective low molecular weight inhibitors of therapeutically relevant proteases 2732 and phosphatases, 3335 and other labs have implemented related strategies to target kinases. 3637 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Non-ATP-competitive inhibitors possess higher degrees of selectivity, however, they generally suffer from a lack of potency. 79 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 To validate that our bivalent probe can identify non-ATP-competitive inhibitors, we examined MEB-SCI, a substrate-competitive c-Src kinase inhibitor recently reported by our laboratory, and obtained a K d = 15.6 µM, which is identical to the reported K i value obtained using an activity-based assay. 7 We envisioned that we could screen a library of putative non-ATP-competitive kinase inhibitors against our bisubstrate probe in a TR-FRET assay. A second screen against an ATP-competitive TR-FRET tracer removes any ATP-competitive compounds from the hits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%