2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl083057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substorm‐Related Near‐Earth Reconnection Surge: Combining Telescopic and Microscopic Views

Abstract: A strong ~11‐min‐long surge of the lobe reconnection was observed during a substorm on the tailward side of the near‐Earth neutral line. In the southern lobe near the reconnection separatrix the MMS spacecraft observed short‐duration earthward electron beams providing the local Hall current, tailward propagating Alfven wave (AW) bursts with Poynting flux up to 10−4 W/m2, and large‐amplitude E field spikes (e‐holes) and low hybrid waves. The reconnection surge was accompanied by substorm current wedge formation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The terrestrial equatorial oval is associated with magnetospheric current disruption, while the poleward auroral oval is associated with the open‐closed magnetic field line boundary, where magnetic reconnection takes place. Coordinated remote observations of auroras and in situ measurements in the magnetosphere show direct connections between auroral intensification and magnetic reconnection (Borg et al., 2007; Fuselier et al., 2007; Matar et al., 2020; Øieroset et al., 1997; Phan et al., 2003; Sergeev et al., 2019; Varsani et al., 2017). Although terrestrial substorms are traditionally caused by magnetospheric current disruption (Lui, 1996), reconnection may directly drive pseudo‐breakup substorms (Pu et al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terrestrial equatorial oval is associated with magnetospheric current disruption, while the poleward auroral oval is associated with the open‐closed magnetic field line boundary, where magnetic reconnection takes place. Coordinated remote observations of auroras and in situ measurements in the magnetosphere show direct connections between auroral intensification and magnetic reconnection (Borg et al., 2007; Fuselier et al., 2007; Matar et al., 2020; Øieroset et al., 1997; Phan et al., 2003; Sergeev et al., 2019; Varsani et al., 2017). Although terrestrial substorms are traditionally caused by magnetospheric current disruption (Lui, 1996), reconnection may directly drive pseudo‐breakup substorms (Pu et al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%