2002
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-20-1321-2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substorm related changes in precipitation in the dayside auroral zone – a multi instrument case study

Abstract: Abstract.A period (08:10-14:40 MLT, 11 February 1997) of enhanced electron density in the D-and E-regions is investigated using EISCAT, IRIS and other complementary instruments. The precipitation is determined to be due to substorm processes occurring close to magnetic midnight. Energetic electrons drift eastward after substorm injection and precipitate in the morning sector. The precipitation is triggered by small pulses in the solar wind pressure, which drive wave particle interactions. The characteristic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(35 reference statements)
4
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the effects of gradient-curvature drift, which predicts that particles on a higher L-shell should reach a particular longitude earlier than particles of the same energy at lower L-shells (e.g. Kavanagh et al, 2002, and references therein). The spike-like enhancements in CNA in the dayside ionosphere are not the same phenomenon as night-side spikes related to the substorm onset/injection.…”
Section: Dayside Absorption (Finnish Sector)supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the effects of gradient-curvature drift, which predicts that particles on a higher L-shell should reach a particular longitude earlier than particles of the same energy at lower L-shells (e.g. Kavanagh et al, 2002, and references therein). The spike-like enhancements in CNA in the dayside ionosphere are not the same phenomenon as night-side spikes related to the substorm onset/injection.…”
Section: Dayside Absorption (Finnish Sector)supporting
confidence: 70%
“…It is probable that this is linked with the motion of the injection region, but also the electrons will gradient-curvature drift eastward towards dawn (e.g. Kavanagh et al, 2002, and references therein). The electrons are quasi-trapped and experience pitch-angle scattering through whistler mode wave interactions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result disagrees with those of Nielsen (1980) and del Pozo et al (2002), who presented several examples demonstrating a significant difference between the absorption and E×B drift velocities, but one has to keep in mind that their observations were performed near magnetic midnight during the substorm expansion phase, while ours refer to a different MLT sector, for which the E×B drift mechanism seems to be dominating (Kavanagh et al, 2002).…”
Section: Summary and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…These authors concluded that the narrow absorption regions appeared to move with a velocity that was consistent with the E×B drift. A similar conclusion was also reached in several case studies that used the data from the Imaging Riometer for Ionospheric Studies (IRIS) in Kilpisjärvi, Finland (Nielsen and Honary, 2000;Kavanagh et al, 2002;del Pozo et al, 2002). In the latter study, however, it was demonstrated that this conclusion seemed to hold only for relatively stable auroral arcs and that during the substorm expansion phase the absorption drift velocity was significantly different from that of convection, as observed by the European Incoherent Scatter (EISCAT) radar facility, a result similar to that of Nielsen (1980).…”
Section: R a Makarevitch Et Al: Imaging Riometer Observations Of Dmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Absorption in the pre-midnight sector is attributed to the precipitation of electrons directly associated with substorm activity (e.g. Ansari, 1964;Ranta et al, 1981), and the precipitation in the morning sector has often been associated with the eastward drift of electrons (Kavanagh et al, 2002 and references therein) following substorm injection. Thus, it is the absorption around midnight that is considered to be of premier geophysical importance, however, for practical purposes (e.g.…”
Section: Diurnal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%