2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009ja014676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substorm convection and current system deduced from the global simulation

Abstract: [1] The substorm mechanism is investigated by analyzing the numerical results obtained through the use of the recently refined magnetohydrodynamic model. After showing the growth phase features, the numerical solution reproduces the observed signatures of a substorm onset, including the formation of a near-Earth neutral line (NENL), earthward directed flow in the plasma sheet, a dipolarization, a geosynchronous D deflection, the development of the nightside field aligned currents (FACs), and electrojets in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
218
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(122 reference statements)
14
218
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 12 illustrates the FC 2 current loop consisting of C1-C2 Birkeland currents (the HCC-LCC currents of Taguchi et al, 1993) with their ionospheric Pedersen current closure and the connection to the cusp dynamo current at high altitudes (on the downstream side of the cusp). The FC 2 current loop is placed in the context of the R1-R2 Birkeland currents with their closure currents in the magnetosphere (ring current and cusp dynamo current) and ionosphere, as described by Tanaka et al (2010) (see their Fig. 20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 12 illustrates the FC 2 current loop consisting of C1-C2 Birkeland currents (the HCC-LCC currents of Taguchi et al, 1993) with their ionospheric Pedersen current closure and the connection to the cusp dynamo current at high altitudes (on the downstream side of the cusp). The FC 2 current loop is placed in the context of the R1-R2 Birkeland currents with their closure currents in the magnetosphere (ring current and cusp dynamo current) and ionosphere, as described by Tanaka et al (2010) (see their Fig. 20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and 7. Schematic illustration of current loops in the magnetosphere-ionosophere system adapted after Tanaka et al (2010). Birkeland current systems (R1-R2 and C1-C2), magnetospheric ring current (RC), cusp dynamo current, and ionospheric closure currents have been marked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 involves the following basic elements: (i) disruption of the CTC in the near-Earth PS (magnetic field dipolarizations seen at geostationary altitude) leading to the activation of the SCW (Bostrøm type I current system; see McPherron et al, 1973), followed by (ii) plasma intrusion to the partial ring current with activation of the injection dynamo (E · J < 0; see e.g. Tanaka et al, 2010, andYau et al, 2013) with associated Bostrøm type II current systems at dusk and dawn, (iii) M-I coupling at subauroral latitudes giving rise to SYM-H partial recovery, and (iv) the presence of BBFs with ionospheric signatures on both sides of the Harang reversal boundary in the later phase of the substorm expansion (persistent phase-partial recovery).…”
Section: P E Sandholt Et Al: Repetitive Substorm Activity Driven Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the reconnection during northward IMF predominantly occurs at high latitudes where antiparallel field regions appear in the northern dusk sector and in the southern dawn sector. For substorms under northward IMF conditions, using global MHD simulations, Tanaka et al [2010] showed that the substorm onset is triggered by a sudden collapse of the plasma sheet and a formation of a high-pressure region in the inner magnetosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%