Substitution of physicians by nurses in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundIn many countries, substitution of physicians by nurses has become common due to the shortage of physicians and the need for high-quality, affordable care, especially for chronic and multi-morbid patients. We examined the evidence on the clinical effectiveness and care costs of physician-nurse substitution in primary care.MethodsWe systematically searched OVID Medline and Embase, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL, up to August 2012; selected and critically appraised published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared nurse-led care with care by primary care physicians on patient satisfaction, Quality of Life (QoL), hospital admission, mortality and costs of healthcare. We assessed the individual study risk of bias, calculated the study-specific and pooled relative risks (RR) or standardised mean differences (SMD); and performed fixed-effects meta-analyses.Results24 RCTs (38,974 participants) and 2 economic studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses showed higher overall scores of patient satisfaction with nurse-led care (SMD 0.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.23), in RCTs of single contact or urgent care, short (less than 6 months) follow-up episodes and in small trials (N ≤ 200). Nurse-led care was effective at reducing the overall risk of hospital admission (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.91), mortality (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.96), in RCTs of on-going or non-urgent care, longer (at least 12 months) follow-up episodes and in larger (N > 200) RCTs. Higher quality RCTs (with better allocation concealment and less attrition) showed higher rates of hospital admissions and mortality with nurse-led care albeit less or not significant. The results seemed more consistent across nurse practitioners than with registered or licensed nurses. The effects of nurse-led care on QoL and costs were difficult to interpret due to heterogeneous outcome reporting, valuation of resources and the small number of studies.ConclusionsThe available evidence continues to be limited by the quality of the research considered. Nurse-led care seems to have a positive effect on patient satisfaction, hospital admission and mortality. This important finding should be confirmed and the determinants of this effect should be assessed in further, larger and more methodically rigorous research.

Electromagnetic-Guided Bedside Placement of Nasoenteral Feeding Tubes by Nurses Is Non-Inferior to Endoscopic Placement by Gastroenterologists: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Additionally, the demand for endoscopic procedures in general has increased considerably over the past decades, e.g., owing to the introduction of colorectal screening programs and advanced therapeutic endoscopy ( 15 ). Several studies have shown that some tasks in health care, including endoscopies and colonoscopies, can successfully be shift ed from physicians to nurses (16)(17)(18)(19).…”

The family medicine reference clinic: an example of interprofessional collaboration within a healthcare team

“…priporočilom, ki definirajo diagnostično-terapevtske in edukacijske poti obravnave pacientov v ambulanti zdravnika družinske medicine in ki so usklajeni in dogovorjeni med strokovnjaki z različnih ravni zdravstvenega varstva (primarni, sekundarni in terciarni nivo) (Vodopivec Jamšek, 2013). Bistvena elementa pri obravnavi pacientov v RADM sta razdelitev dela med člani tima v skladu s kompetencami posamezne stroke in njihovo medsebojno sodelovanje (Poplas Susič, et al, 2013;Martínez-González, et al, 2014).…”

“…The division of labour among team members in line with the competencies of individual professions and their mutual collaboration (Poplas Susič, et al, 2013;Martínez-González, et al, 2014) are two key elements of patient treatment in FMRCs.…”

Changing Territories of Health Care Professionals in Primary Care

“…The notion of independent medical care by NPs (and PAs) caught the imagination of policy-makers, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) announced increased funding for clinics run by NPs. There is, however, lack of cost-effectiveness evidence of substituting nurses for physicians [8,[51][52][53]. Educating NPs may be (much) shorter and cheaper than physicians, but without taking into account their relative incomes and the numbers of patients they see each day (and additional costs of referrals, prescriptions and testing), is it hard to assess the cost-benefit ratio of such Traditionally, private insurers typically use those schedules as a template for their own fees.…”