Substitution in "Measure for Measure"

Leggatt, Alexander

doi:10.2307/2870931

Cited by 21 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A play which exerts a great deal of effort to understand how rulers can and should execute justice within 5 (Kirsch 1975;Gless 1979;Brad-Brook 1941) all hold variations on this position. 6 (Leggatt 1988;Byker 2016) both address the importance of the theological implications of substitution in Measure for Measure. the limitations of sin ends with no human solution or earthly political theology intact.…”

Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bondage of the Will: The Limitations of Political Theology in Measure for Measure

Besteman

2019

Religions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although Peter Lake and Debora Shuger have argued that Measure for Measure is hostile to Calvinist theology, I argue that the play’s world presents a Reformed theo-political sensibility, not in order to criticize Calvinism, but to reveal limitations in dominant political theories. Reformed theology informs the world of the play, especially with regards to the corruption of the human will through original sin. Politically, the sinfulness of the human will raises concerns about governments—despite Biblical commands to obey leaders, how can they be trusted if subject to the same corruption of will as citizens? Close analysis of key passages reveals that while individual characters in Measure suggest solutions that account in part for the corruption of the will, none of their political theories manage to contain the radical effects of sin in Angelo’s will. Despite this failure, restorative justice occurs in Act 5, indicating forces outside of human authority and will account for the comedic ending. This gestures towards the dependence of governments in a post-Reformation world on providential protection and reveals why the Reformed belief in the limitations of the human will point towards the collapse of the theory of the King’s two bodies.

show abstract