2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substituting Whole Blood for Urine in a Bedside Pregnancy Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This case generates the question of appropriate pregnancy testing in a woman with low likelihood of pregnancy but with significant risk factors for a highly morbid pregnancy. While the sensitivity for urine pregnancy testing nears 100% for normally implanted pregnancies, [24][25][26] especially after 4 to 6 weeks of gestation, there still exists a small possibility for false-negative results. Quantitative serum pregnancy testing may have correctly identified this patient as pregnant, despite the negative qualitative urine test, and cost and time differences between the two tests are negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case generates the question of appropriate pregnancy testing in a woman with low likelihood of pregnancy but with significant risk factors for a highly morbid pregnancy. While the sensitivity for urine pregnancy testing nears 100% for normally implanted pregnancies, [24][25][26] especially after 4 to 6 weeks of gestation, there still exists a small possibility for false-negative results. Quantitative serum pregnancy testing may have correctly identified this patient as pregnant, despite the negative qualitative urine test, and cost and time differences between the two tests are negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision to wait 10 minutes was based upon the prior accuracy study protocol from Fromm et. 2 After 10 minutes, the time and result were recorded in a study binder. The blood results were not used clinically in any manner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fromm et al previously demonstrated in 633 patients that urine and whole blood have similar test characteristics when used in one common brand of POC pregnancy testing, with a higher sensitivity and a lower human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) threshold level observed in the whole blood specimen group. 2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even under circumstances that sought to minimize sample transit times, POCT results were available an average of 46 minutes earlier than from the central laboratory [ 15 ]. Several studies evaluating point-of-care pregnancy testing in the ED found that, regardless of whether ED staff evaluated pregnancy status by using urine or a qualitative human chorionic gonadotropin immunoassay kit, POCT could yield sufficiently sensitive results faster than if samples were sent to a central laboratory [ 11 ] as processing and handling delays inherently extended laboratory TATs.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%