1986
DOI: 10.1016/0010-8545(86)80037-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substituted ruthenium carbonyl halides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 191 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both these tricarbonyl complexes have mer stereochemistry, which is unusual in that this places the two strongly trans directing CO ligands to be mutually trans. There are very few reported examples of complexes with such an arrangement, two of which are mer-[RuI(CO) 3 (PPh 3 ) 2 ], [7] and trans,trans-[RuCl 2 (CO) 2 (PPh 3 ) 2 ]. [8] The adoption of this unfavourable configuration in those complexes can be attributed to an over-riding steric repulsion between the two monodentate phosphine ligands but that cannot be the reason in the case of 2 a and 2 b.…”
Section: Reaction Of N-heterocyclic Carbenes Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these tricarbonyl complexes have mer stereochemistry, which is unusual in that this places the two strongly trans directing CO ligands to be mutually trans. There are very few reported examples of complexes with such an arrangement, two of which are mer-[RuI(CO) 3 (PPh 3 ) 2 ], [7] and trans,trans-[RuCl 2 (CO) 2 (PPh 3 ) 2 ]. [8] The adoption of this unfavourable configuration in those complexes can be attributed to an over-riding steric repulsion between the two monodentate phosphine ligands but that cannot be the reason in the case of 2 a and 2 b.…”
Section: Reaction Of N-heterocyclic Carbenes Withmentioning
confidence: 99%