2005
DOI: 10.1021/ja037454r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substituent Effects on the Edge-to-Face Aromatic Interactions

Abstract: The edge-to-face interactions for either axially or facially substituted benzenes are investigated by using ab initio calculations. The predicted maximum energy difference between substituted and unsubstituted systems is approximately 0.7 kcal/mol (approximately 1.2 kcal/mol if substituents are on both axially and facially substituted positions). In the case of axially substituted aromatic systems, the electron density at the para position is an important stabilizing factor, and thus the stabilization/destabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
151
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
15
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benzene pair geometry in Table 1 is the parallel-displaced configuration. These studies also indicate that substituents, typically make the stacking stronger with respect to benzene stacking, which is confirmed in our results for methyl and chlorine substituents [44][45][46].…”
Section: Guest-guest Interactions In Gas Phasesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The benzene pair geometry in Table 1 is the parallel-displaced configuration. These studies also indicate that substituents, typically make the stacking stronger with respect to benzene stacking, which is confirmed in our results for methyl and chlorine substituents [44][45][46].…”
Section: Guest-guest Interactions In Gas Phasesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…2) as simple H-p and p-p interaction models with small binding energy ($1.5-3 kcal/mol) has received a great attention from both experiment and theory over last decades. [8,[26][27][28][29][30] The binding energy of the benzene dimer at the coupled cluster with single, double and perturbative triple excitations level [CCSD(T)] using the complete basis set (CBS) limit shows that the T-shaped edge-to-face conformer is nearly isoenergetic ($2.5 kcal/mol in zero-point-energy corrected binding energy) to the parallel-displaced face-to-face conformer. [8] The strength and configurational orientation of H-p and p-p interactions can be controlled by replacing H or C atoms (heteroatom effect) with other atoms or chemical groups.…”
Section: Factors Influencing P Interaction Strengths H-p and P-p Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation of substituent effects on the stability of p-p stacking interactions is also investigated with computed electrostatic potentials (ESPs) and Hammett rconstants models. [8,27,[33][34][35] These models reveal that electronwithdrawing substituents enhance stacking interactions in benzene dimers while electron donating substituents give the opposite effect and hinder stacking interactions. Tarakeshwar et al studied the H-p interaction using the systems of an olefinic (ethene)/aromatic (benzene) p compound interacting with one of HX (X: halide), H 2 O, NH 3 , and CH 4 molecules.…”
Section: Factors Influencing P Interaction Strengths H-p and P-p Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eqn (1) has the main importance in interpreting the values of the parameters 2 s and r; less in predicting the unknown values of E. Nevertheless, it serves still as reference when investigating reactivities or activities of benzene derivatives. 3 The exact range of validity is of central importance for any empirical relationship 2 and numerous attempts were made to delimit it for eqn (1) with more precision. 2,4 In kinetics, the deviations encountered were mostly attributed to complex reaction mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%