1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(01)92225-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substituent effects on the cyclization of hex-5-enyl radical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selective formation of ketone from the biradical can be attributed most simply to a steric effect, with more rapid closure on the unsubstituted a-methylene carbon than on the disubstituted carbonyl carbon. This suggestion finds support in the recent demonstration that the rate of intramolecular radical addition to a double bond is strongly influenced by the degree of substitution a t the site of reaction 18. Only in a substrate such as 3, with restricted rotation about the C(a)-C(p) bond, does formation of a methylenecyclobutan-01 become the predominant mode of photochemical rearrangement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Selective formation of ketone from the biradical can be attributed most simply to a steric effect, with more rapid closure on the unsubstituted a-methylene carbon than on the disubstituted carbonyl carbon. This suggestion finds support in the recent demonstration that the rate of intramolecular radical addition to a double bond is strongly influenced by the degree of substitution a t the site of reaction 18. Only in a substrate such as 3, with restricted rotation about the C(a)-C(p) bond, does formation of a methylenecyclobutan-01 become the predominant mode of photochemical rearrangement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Substituents at C-1 (R 1,2 ) and C-6 (R 4,5 ) were consistently found to cause small rate enhancements (1.4-2.4) in 1,5-cyclizations except where there was geminal disubstitution as part of a ring, which caused a very small rate retardation (0.94). [25][26][27][28] In all cases, the amount of competing 1,6-cyclization either remained unchanged or was markedly decreased. In contrast, substituents at C-5 (R 3 ) led to strong rate retardations (e.g.…”
Section: Substituent Effectsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Athel extrapolated further and suggested that hence, in polymerizations and other intermolecular additions, 'the observed preference for radical attack at the less substituted terminus of an unsymmetrical olefin is due primarily to steric factors, and not, as is often supposed, to the stabilizing effect of alkyl substituents on the newly formed radical'. [27] An example where the uncertainties arising from formation of different ring sizes from addition to either end of the olefinic bond were obviated came from David Johnson's work on cyclizations of 2-(cyclopent-3-enyl)ethyl radicals 14a (R ¼ H) and 14b (R ¼ CH 3 ) (Scheme 6). The competing modes of cyclization gave the same ring size and were stereoelectronically equivalent.…”
Section: Substituent Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic studies on hex-5-en-1-yl radical cyclisations have indicated that E and Z isomers cyclise at similar rates. [44,51] In a previous report we showed that the linear/cyclised selectivity is best explained by use of the equations proposed by Saveant's group to interpret the selectivity observed in the yields of rearranged products in the vicinity of a cathode. [46,47,52] In these equations, the diffusion coefficients associated with the reactive species play a definite role.…”
Section: Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%