2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substituent effects on some calculated NMR data in T-shaped configuration of benzene dimer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Configurations with minor variations in angles less than 30° are suggested to be similar in energy by previous theoretical studies . It is also suggested that various substituent effects on the relative stability of stacking. , Third, the favorable London dispersion interactions and, therefore, π–π stacking may be underestimated with the fixed partial charges in the classical MD force field. , London dispersion interactions are originated from instantaneous multipole/induced multipole charge fluctuations, which make it essential to describe the polarizability accurately. The previous studies with molecular mechanics force fields slightly underestimated π–π interactions. It was also suggested that π–π interactions in water have higher energy minimum than that of the solvent-free state due to the damping by solvent competition and the entropic effects. ,, This may explain why the stacking arrangements are not well-defined in the filament system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Configurations with minor variations in angles less than 30° are suggested to be similar in energy by previous theoretical studies . It is also suggested that various substituent effects on the relative stability of stacking. , Third, the favorable London dispersion interactions and, therefore, π–π stacking may be underestimated with the fixed partial charges in the classical MD force field. , London dispersion interactions are originated from instantaneous multipole/induced multipole charge fluctuations, which make it essential to describe the polarizability accurately. The previous studies with molecular mechanics force fields slightly underestimated π–π interactions. It was also suggested that π–π interactions in water have higher energy minimum than that of the solvent-free state due to the damping by solvent competition and the entropic effects. ,, This may explain why the stacking arrangements are not well-defined in the filament system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…21 It is also suggested that various substituent effects on the relative stability of stacking. 41,42 Third, the favorable London dispersion interactions and, therefore, π ‒ π stacking may be underestimated with the fixed partial charges in the classical MD force field. 43,44 London dispersion interactions are originated from instantaneous multipole/induced multipole charge fluctuations, which make it essential to describe the polarizability accurately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR data reflect the electronic structure molecules and therefore can be a powerful tool in characterizing interactions [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. Table 1 Binding energies (in kcal mol -1 ), the distance between center of rings, intermolecular halogen bond length and Cl-F bond length (in Å ) and the Hammett electronic parameters in X-ben||pyrÁÁÁCl-F complexes at MP2/aug-ccpVDZ level of theory The effect of p-p stacking interactions on the twobonded spin-spin coupling constant 2X J(N-F) across 15 NÁÁÁ 35 Cl-19 F halogen bond was explored in X-ben||-pyrÁÁÁCl-F complexes.…”
Section: Spin-spin Coupling Constants Across 15 Nááá 35 Cl-19 F Halogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 , 21 , 28 Electron-withdrawing substituents on the C–H donor reduce the electron density around the hydrogens at the interface between the two rings, resulting in a stronger interaction. 21 , 28 , 29 The interaction is also strengthened if the substituent on the H-donating ring is in close proximity to the accepting ring. 28 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strengths of T-shaped benzene interactions depend on the electron-withdrawing or -donating nature of the substituent and on whether the substitution is on the arene C–H donor or on the acceptor benzene. ,, Electron-withdrawing substituents on the C–H donor reduce the electron density around the hydrogens at the interface between the two rings, resulting in a stronger interaction. ,, The interaction is also strengthened if the substituent on the H-donating ring is in close proximity to the accepting ring …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%