“…Initial screenings of the titles and abstracts of these studies revealed that 937 papers did not meet the study criteria and duplication was also present in an additional 74 papers (they did not match the thematic criteria). The remaining 34 articles were read, and after applying the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, we selected nine articles for analysis (Abajobir et al, ; Dube et al, ; Fergusson et al, ; Hayatbakhsh et al, , ; Huang et al, ; Rogosch et al, ; Van der Pol et al, ; Wilson and Widom, ). After an indepth review of the reference lists of the nine selected papers, we identified an additional paper (Silverman et al, ) that was also included.…”