2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021jg006312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substantial Stem Methane Emissions From Rainforest and Cacao Agroforest Partly Negate Soil Uptake in the Congo Basin

Abstract: Forest CO 2 dynamics feature prominently in global carbon (C) cycle studies, but the role of forests in the CH 4 cycle is relatively poorly understood. Although a considerable number of studies have been undertaken to constrain the net balance of CH 4 , the global CH 4 budget is still characterized by high uncertainty (Saunois et al., 2020), especially for the tropics (Valentini et al., 2014). Until now, bottom-up estimates of the global CH 4 budget from terrestrial ecosystems do not distinctively include an e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall low CH 4 uptake in our forested volcanic soil was probably also influenced by its low soil mineral N levels (Table 2). Limitation by N availability on soil CH 4 consumption had been reported for forests in Indonesia (Hassler et al 2015), Panama (Matson et al 2017;Veldkamp et al 2013), Ecuador (Wolf et al 2012, and Cameroon (Iddris et al 2021) with Andosol, Cambisol and highly weathered Acrisol and Ferralsol soils.…”
Section: Soil Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From the Forestmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall low CH 4 uptake in our forested volcanic soil was probably also influenced by its low soil mineral N levels (Table 2). Limitation by N availability on soil CH 4 consumption had been reported for forests in Indonesia (Hassler et al 2015), Panama (Matson et al 2017;Veldkamp et al 2013), Ecuador (Wolf et al 2012, and Cameroon (Iddris et al 2021) with Andosol, Cambisol and highly weathered Acrisol and Ferralsol soils.…”
Section: Soil Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From the Forestmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Additionally, during the wet season gas diffusion from the atmosphere to the soil could decrease as soil moisture content increased (Fig. 1e), which may limit CH 4 availability to microsites where concurrent methanotrophic activity occur (Iddris et al 2021;Matson et al 2017;Tchiofo Lontsi et al 2020;Veldkamp et al 2013). Additionally, the increasing CH 4 uptake with increasing NO 3 levels (Fig.…”
Section: Soil Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From the Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research has highlighted the importance of soil texture in governing greenhouse gas emissions through its influence on the quantity of micro- and macropores within the soil, which is essential for aeration and subsequently affects gas diffusion 28 . Increased clay content could hinder the diffusion of atmospheric CH 4 into the soil, restricting aerobic CH 4 oxidation and enhancing anaerobic microsite CH 4 production in clayey soils, particularly during the rainy season 46 , 47 . Additionally, Martins et al highlighted that soil moisture and sand content exerted the most pronounced direct influence on CH 4 fluxes, while rainfall indirectly affected fluxes by directly impacting soil moisture and gas diffusivity 48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies showing the influence of soil physical and chemical attributes on GHGs fluxes, for example in China (Liu et al, 2017; Wu et al, 2022; Zhao et al, 2019; Zhuang & Tian, 2021), in Africa (Iddris et al, 2021; MacCarthy et al, 2018; Tchiofo Lontsi et al, 2020; Wanyama et al, 2019), in Europe (Bras et al, 2022; Christiansen & Gundersen, 2011; Forster et al, 2021; Schaufler et al, 2010), in the USA (Melillo et al, 2017; Mushinski et al, 2019; Ni & Groffman, 2018; Porter & Dillingham, 2021) and in Brazil (Costa et al, 2018; de Oliveira et al, 2021; Godoi et al, 2016; Monteiro et al, 2020; Van Haren et al, 2013; Veloso et al, 2019); however, most of these studies have focussed on a specific gas, and not the three main GHGs simultaneously (e.g. Castaldi et al, 2020; Gatica et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2017; MacCarthy et al, 2018; Zhao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%