2018
DOI: 10.1136/vr.104734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substantial numerical decline in South Australian rabbit populations following the detection of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus 2

Abstract: GI.2, also commonly known as rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus 2, was first detected at two long-term monitoring sites for European rabbits, , in South Australia, in mid-2016. Numbers of rabbits in the following 12-18 months were reduced to approximately 20 per cent of average numbers in the preceding 10 years. The impact recorded at the two South Australian sites, if widespread in Australia and persistent for several years, is likely to be of enormous economic and environmental benefit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, associations between RHDV2 arrival and population impact were hampered by the lack of adequate pre‐arrival data for some sites in those states. Although impacts were substantial at some sites, they were somewhat lower than those recorded at more arid, inland sites in South Australia (80%; Mutze et al, ) and substantially lower than the initial impacts of classical RHDV when it entered Australia (Mutze, Cooke, & Alexander, ). However, the average reductions were similar to that reported for rabbit populations in southern Spain (57% reduction) following the arrival of RHDV2 (Guerrero‐Casado, Carpio, & Tortosa, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, associations between RHDV2 arrival and population impact were hampered by the lack of adequate pre‐arrival data for some sites in those states. Although impacts were substantial at some sites, they were somewhat lower than those recorded at more arid, inland sites in South Australia (80%; Mutze et al, ) and substantially lower than the initial impacts of classical RHDV when it entered Australia (Mutze, Cooke, & Alexander, ). However, the average reductions were similar to that reported for rabbit populations in southern Spain (57% reduction) following the arrival of RHDV2 (Guerrero‐Casado, Carpio, & Tortosa, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Unlike RHDV (Robinson, So, Müller, Cooke, & Capucci, ), RHDV2 causes fatal infections in juvenile rabbits <5 weeks of age (Neave et al, ) and can also infect rabbits recovered from previous RHDV infection or vaccination (Le Gall‐Reculé et al, ; Neave et al, ; Peacock et al, ). Initial estimates of the impact of RHDV2 on wild populations from two sites in South Australia indicated a reduction in rabbit abundance of around 80% (Mutze et al, ). As reductions in rabbit abundance of this magnitude would result in huge economic benefits to Australian agriculture (Cooke, Chudleigh, Simpson, & Saunders, ), it would be advantageous to understand the wider dynamics and impact of RHDV2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, where each state once had teams within veterinary, agricultural and environmental research institutions involved with surveillance and monitoring, it is now increasingly the case that only one or two individual scientists or veterinarians work in conjunction with inter‐state and international colleagues to remain informed and piece together epidemiological events. A recent example of this is a study by Mutze and others, 2 summarised on p 574 of this week's issue of Vet Record , in relation to the emergence and spread of rabbit haemorrhagic disease 2 (RHDV2) through the population of introduced wild European rabbits in Australia.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rabbit carcases obtained in this way not only provided information on the rate of spread of RHDV2 but also suggested that this second virus variant is displacing the former RHDV1 virus, as has been the case in Europe. 4 Greatly reduced abundance of rabbits, monitored by regular night-time spotlight counts and live-trapping studies at two widely spaced locations in South Australia, 2 indicates that RHDV2 is causing high mortality, despite earlier laboratory trials suggesting it was not as virulent as RHDV1, 5 although opinion is divided on whether this is the case. 6 The arrival of RHDV2 in Australia can be seen as an unplanned addition to a series of introductions of biological control agents that began with myxoma virus in 1950 7 and continued with the use of European rabbit leas (Spilopsyllus cuniculi) in the late 1960s 8 then 'Spanish' rabbit leas (Xenopsylla cunicularis) as additional vectors of myxoma virus, 9 followed by RHDV1 in 1995.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation