2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substantial nation-wide improvement in lung cancer relative survival in Norway from 2000 to 2016

Abstract: There have been notable changes in incidence patterns and a remarkable improvement in survival for lung cancer over the last 17 years, most markedly for patients without distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. Hopefully, survival will improve even more when immunotherapy is implemented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
31
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability of receiving surgical treatment in localized LC increased markedly, in contrast with findings from Norway where the percentage operated decreased for three major histologic types [10]. Our findings suggest that the rate of surgical treatment tends to be higher in Estonia than in several other countries.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The probability of receiving surgical treatment in localized LC increased markedly, in contrast with findings from Norway where the percentage operated decreased for three major histologic types [10]. Our findings suggest that the rate of surgical treatment tends to be higher in Estonia than in several other countries.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Nonetheless, squamous cell carcinoma remained the largest group within NSCLC, contrary to the findings in England and the US [22]. The changes in the proportion of adenocarcinoma in women in Estonia were similar to those observed in Norway [10], but the proportion in men remained considerably lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dessuten har Beslutningsforum for nye metoder hatt ett eller flere lungekreftmedikamenter på dagsordenen i 13 av 24 møter (54 %) i samme periode (3). Som det framgår under, har de nye behandlingsmulighetene bidratt til betydelig bedret overlevelse for pasientgruppen, og dermed en kraftig økende prevalens (4,5). Kombinasjonen av økt kompleksitet og økt pasientvolum har resultert i at arbeidet med lungekreftpasienter i spesialisthelsetjenesten er blitt atskillig mer omfattende enn for bare få år siden.…”
unclassified