Substance Use and Substance Use Disorders

Chassin, Laurie; Colder, Craig R.; Hussong, Andrea M.; Sher, Kenneth J.

doi:10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy319

Cited by 57 publications

(72 citation statements)

References 735 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Prior work has established a variety of correlates of peer and adolescent AU that could confound the relationship between peer and adolescent SU (Chassin et al, in press; Zucker, 2006). In the current study, confounders included demographics (index of socioeconomic status, age, parental marital status, minority status, and gender), pubertal status, temperament (effortful control, negative affect, surgency, Behavioral Inhibition System [BIS] fear, BIS anxiety, Behavioral Activation System [BAS] impulsivity/fun seeking, BAS reward responsiveness, and BAS drive), psychopathology (depressed mood, oppositional defiant disorder [ODD], conduct disorder [CD], ADHD-inattention, and ADHD-hyperactivity), family environment (alcohol specific parenting, parental AU [average daily drinking averaged across mother and father], parental problematic AU [alcohol related negative consequences averaged across mother and father], and adolescent AU with parents permission), W1 peer delinquency, W1 AU for the socialization models, and W1 peer AU for the selection models.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Once selection has occurred parenting is likely involved in maintaining or exacerbating adolescent and peer SU over time through inadequate parental monitoring which provides increased opportunity to spend unstructured time with peers (Osgood et al, 1996). In addition to effects on peer selection, each of these variables has also been linked to an adolescent's own SU (Alati et al, 2014; Costello et al, 2007; Hitner & Swickert, 2006; Hussong, et al, 1998; King, et al, 2004; Kohl & Mermelstein, 2004; Trucco et al, 2014; for reviews see Chassin et al, in press; Zucker, 2006). Therefore, not only do these factors represent potential confounds regarding the causal mechanism of selection, they also represent potential confounds for socialization effects given that observed effects from peer to adolescent SU may be artifacts of earlier or concurrent selection or earlier socialization.…”

Section: Selection/socialization Effects Within a Broader Theoreticalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Initiation of alcohol use (AU) before age 15 is associated with higher risk for later substance abuse disorders (Grant & Dawson, 1997; Sung, Erkanli, Angold, & Costello, 2004) and many other adverse outcomes including decreased school attendance, car accidents, binge drinking, other drug use, and later depression (Grueber, DiClemente, Anderson, & Lodico, 1996; Marmorstein, 2009). Although the literature documents many correlates of adolescent SU (Chassin, Colder, Hussong, & Sher, in press; Ennett et al, 2008; Zucker, 2006), researchers often emphasize the importance of social context, especially peer SU, as one of the most robust and proximal influences of early adolescent SU (Ennett et al, 2006; Hawkins, Catalano, & Miller, 1992). Given that the risk associated with early initiation and subsequent heavy use has been linked to long-term negative outcomes (Chassin, King, & Flora, 2004) understanding whether or not peer SU is a causal factor in the early initiation and escalation of SU will aid in the development of preventative interventions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is evidence for both selection and socialization of early adolescent AU across longitudinal studies that utilized various methodologies including ecological momentary assessment, social network analysis, and cross-lagged panel designs (Curran, Stice, & Chassin, 1997; Dishion & Skaggs, 2000; Knecht, Burk, Weesie, & Steglich, 2010; Poelen et al, 2007; for a review see Leung, Toumbourou, & Hemphill, 2011). These general conclusions must be tempered in light of the fact that previous work on peer selection and socialization has generally not accounted for the wide range of known correlates of adolescent and peer SU, which include temperament and personality (Chassin, Flora, & King, 2004), psychopathology (King, Iacono, & McGue, 2004; Colder et al, 2013), peer delinquency (Scalco et al, 2014), parental drinking and alcoholism (Alati et al, 2014; Hussong, Curran, & Chassin, 1998), pubertal timing (Costello, Sung, Worthman, & Angold, 2007), amongst others (Chassin, Colder, Hussong, & Sher, in press; Zucker, 2006). These variables are potential confounders for the association between peer and adolescent AU.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Selection and Socialization Effects in Early Adolescent Alcohol Use: A Propensity Score Analysis

Scalco

Trucco

Coffman

et al. 2015

J Abnorm Child Psychol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The robust correlation between peer and adolescent alcohol use (AU) has been taken as evidence for both socialization and selection processes in the etiology of adolescent AU. Accumulating evidence from studies using a diverse range of methodological and statistical approaches suggests that both processes are involved. A major challenge in testing whether peer AU predicts an adolescent's drinking (socialization) or whether an adolescent's drinking predicts peer AU (selection) is the myriad of potentially confounding factors that might lead to an overestimation of socialization and selection effects. After creating AU transition groups based on peer and adolescent AU across two waves (N = 765; age = 10-15; 53% female), we test whether transitions into AU by adolescents and peers predict later peer and adolescent AU respectively, using (1) propensity score analysis to balance transition groups on 26 potential confounds, (2) a longitudinal design with three waves to establish temporal precedence, and (3) both adolescent (target) and peer self-report of peer AU to disentangle effects attributable to shared reporter bias. Both selection and socialization were supported using both peer self-report of AU and adolescent-report of peer AU. Although cross-sectional analyses suggested peer self-reported models were associated with smaller effects than perceived peer AU, longitudinal analyses suggest a similar sized effect across reporter of peer AU for both selection and socialization. The implications of these findings for the etiology and treatment of adolescent AU are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Selection/socialization Effects Within a Broader Theoreticalmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Selection and Socialization Effects in Early Adolescent Alcohol Use: A Propensity Score Analysis

Scalco

Trucco

Coffman

et al. 2015

J Abnorm Child Psychol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prospective longitudinal studies of children without ADHD also find associations between early appearing personality features or other behaviors consistent with ADHD (e.g., impulsive, restless, distractible) and later alcohol-related outcomes (Caspi, Moffitt, Newman, & Silva, 1996; Masse & Tremblay, 1997; Niemela et al, 2006; Tarter, Kirisci, Habeych, Reynolds, & Vanyukov, 2004). In contrast to research on ADHD, multi-variable vulnerability pathways to adolescent alcohol use have been well-studied in community samples (Chassin, Colder, Hussong, & Sher, 2013). Such research is only just beginning to accumulate for children with ADHD (Molina & Pelham, 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Change over time in adolescent and friend alcohol use: Differential associations for youth with and without childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Belendiuk¹,

Pedersen²,

King³

et al. 2016

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Individuals with ADHD are at increased risk for experiencing alcohol-related problems by adulthood. However, few studies have examined contextual factors that may contribute to this risk. The current study examined one widely investigated social-contextual risk factor, friend alcohol use, in a sample of adolescents with and without a history of ADHD. One hundred and fifty nine adolescents (14-17 years old) with childhood ADHD and 117 demographically-similar youth without ADHD were interviewed annually in the Pittsburgh ADHD Longitudinal Study. Adolescents reported the frequency of their own alcohol use in the prior 12 months and the number of friends who used alcohol regularly or occasionally (perceived friend alcohol use). Multiple-group parallel process models indicated that increases in friend alcohol use were more strongly associated with increases in adolescent alcohol use over time for individuals with ADHD (r = 0.15, SE = 0.04; CI95 = 0.08 to 0.22) than for those without ADHD (r = 0.06, SE = 0.03; CI95 = 0.00 to 0.11). These results suggest that social factors are an important part of escalating alcohol use among adolescents with ADHD histories, and they highlight the possibility that interventions focused on the peer context could be important for these at-risk youth. Additional social network research on adolescent alcohol use within the larger context of other relationships (e.g. family and romantic relationships) is indicated.

show abstract