2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11904-019-00424-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substance Use and HIV Among Justice-Involved Youth: Intersecting Risks

Abstract: Purpose of review.-This review discusses recent advances in research on the intersection of HIV prevention and substance use among youth involved with the justice system. We discuss current themes of recent findings and provide guidance for researchers, policymakers and clinicians on next steps in advancing work in this nascent area.Recent findings.-Of the 46 studies that measured HIV risk and substance use among justiceinvolved youth, 56% were cross-sectional designs, 22% were intervention trials, and 22% wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis suggests that disadvantaged groups in need of MAT, especially those groups impacted by CJ-involvement, may have more opportunities to access a broader range of services in expansion states. Promoting the adoption of Medicaid expansion in states that have not implemented it, as well as strengthening existing programs in expansion states, are potential ways to improve health outcomes among CJ-involved individuals who often have multiple intersecting health exposures [ 48 51 ]. Research from San Francisco’s Transitions Clinic Network has demonstrated that tailoring substance use treatment services to the unique needs of CJ-involved individuals is effective in improving health outcomes and reducing recidivism [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis suggests that disadvantaged groups in need of MAT, especially those groups impacted by CJ-involvement, may have more opportunities to access a broader range of services in expansion states. Promoting the adoption of Medicaid expansion in states that have not implemented it, as well as strengthening existing programs in expansion states, are potential ways to improve health outcomes among CJ-involved individuals who often have multiple intersecting health exposures [ 48 51 ]. Research from San Francisco’s Transitions Clinic Network has demonstrated that tailoring substance use treatment services to the unique needs of CJ-involved individuals is effective in improving health outcomes and reducing recidivism [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juvenile offenders who abuse drugs have more severe delinquent behavior, are more likely to recidivate, and are more likely to continue offending into adulthood (Schubert, Mulvey, & Glasheen, 2011; Wibbelink, Hoeve, Stams, & Oort, 2017). Additionally, substance use in juvenile offenders is linked to worse educational, vocational, and health outcomes (Chassin, Mansion, Nichter, & Losoya, 2014; Schubert et al, 2011; Tolou-Shams, Harrison, Hirschtritt, Dauria, & Barr-Walker, 2019; Zajac et al, in press). Up to three-quarters of detained youth meet criteria for at least one behavioral health disorder, the most common being substance use disorders (Teplin et al, 2013; Schubert et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most evidence-based practices for HIV services in justice-involved populations have either been developed for younger youth (Tolou-Shams et al, 2019 ) or delivered for adults in (locked) correctional settings (Belenko, Hiller, et al, 2013 ; Belenko, Visher, et al, 2013 ; Elkington et al, 2016 ). Recent data from juvenile community supervision agencies noted that approximately two-thirds do not offer any HIV/STI related services (Elkington et al, 2020 ), either on-site or via referral to community-based partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to addressing system level linkages and service integration within ASPs, better interventions are needed to address HIV and SU among JIYA. Existing HIV prevention interventions for justice-involved youth show variable efficacy (Tolou-Shams, Harrison, Hirschtritt, Dauria, & Barr-Walker, 2019 ) and are largely developed for younger youth (< 18 years). Similarly, SU brief interventions have largely been developed for adolescent and general adult populations, rather than young adults (Mitchell, Gryczynski, O'Grady, & Schwartz, 2013 ; Sommers et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%