2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03989.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substaging by estimating the size of invasive tumour can improve risk stratification in pT1 urothelial bladder cancer-evaluation of a large hospital-based single-centre series

Abstract: Comparison of two systems of substaging pT1 bladder cancer shows that measurement of the size of infiltrating tumour area by HPFs may improve risk stratification. An infiltrative growth pattern on the invasion front should be documented in the pathological report, indicating a worse outcome. Additional studies are needed to find further parameters detecting high-risk tumours.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
75
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous research groups worldwide have scrutinized a wide array of parameters to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict tumour progression in stage pT1 UBC [18-24]. Among these parameters grading appears to constitute the most powerful prognostic histopathological feature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous research groups worldwide have scrutinized a wide array of parameters to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict tumour progression in stage pT1 UBC [18-24]. Among these parameters grading appears to constitute the most powerful prognostic histopathological feature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, shortcomings of current grading systems for prognostic assessment were suggested [23]. Likewise, substaging of pT1 NMIBC in relation to depth of lamina propria invasion has been proposed due to inaccuracy of prognostic assessment [24,25]. Molecular markers seem not to suffice in this regard and require further assessment [5,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the old WHO 1973 classification system, discerning G2 and G3 tumors, still has prognostic value compared with the more recent WHO 2004 system [8][9][10]. Consequently, the European Association of Urology guidelines continue to support the WHO 1973 system [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The main reason was lack of consensus regarding the identification of the MM-VP at the invasion front of the tumor and the inability to substage patients in a significant percentage (up to 42%) of cases [1,[5][6][7]. To circumvent this problem, new reproducible and user-friendly systems for T1 substage were developed, for example, the system that discerns T1-microinvasive (T1m) and T1-extensive-invasive (T1e) tumors [1,[6][7][8]. In two head-to-head comparisons, T1m and T1e proved more user friendly, could be used in 100% of cases, and predicted progression in multivariable analyses, making them more robust tools to substage T1 BCa than T1a-T1c [6,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation