2010
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-2010-10722-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subspaces of almost Daugavet spaces

Abstract: We study the almost Daugavet property, a generalization of the Daugavet property. It is analysed what kind of subspaces and sums of Banach spaces with the almost Daugavet property have this property as well. The main result of the paper is: if Z is a closed subspace of a separable almost Daugavet space X such that the quotient space X/Z contains no copy of ℓ 1 , then Z has the almost Daugavet property, too.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 46B04.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalizations of T (•) were considered and studied in [12,4,5]; while relations with other parameters can be seen in [14,13,3]. Spaces X for which T (X) = 2 have been considered in [2,9,10]). In particular, a Banach space X for which T (X) = 2 must contain ℓ 1 ([2]); hence it cannot be reflexive (see also [9,Thm.…”
Section: Introduction and Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalizations of T (•) were considered and studied in [12,4,5]; while relations with other parameters can be seen in [14,13,3]. Spaces X for which T (X) = 2 have been considered in [2,9,10]). In particular, a Banach space X for which T (X) = 2 must contain ℓ 1 ([2]); hence it cannot be reflexive (see also [9,Thm.…”
Section: Introduction and Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of what is known concerning T (X) and t(X) can be found by combining [22], [5] and [8] (note that the two latter overlap a bit on T -results). The particular case when X is separable and T (X) = 2 is thoroughly described in terms of the almost Daugavet property in [17] and [19]. For the non-separable case see [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%