1995
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051085.x-i1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsistence Hunting in Arabuko‐Sokoke Forest, Kenya, and Its Effects on Mammal Populations

Abstract: Mammal populations in Arabuko‐Sokoke Forest, Kenya, provide an important source of protein and income for local communities. The harvested biomass in 1991 was over 350 kg/km2, and the economic value of the harvest was over 1.3 million KShs (approximately US$35,000). Bushpigs, aardvarks, and primates comprise 95% of the harvested biomass, but the main prey in terms of number of animals killed (35% of total) was the four‐toed elephant shrew (Petrodomus tetradactylus). Trapping is concentrated on the periphery of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From our sample of 25 case studies (which often incorporate multiple sites, and providing insights from 14 countries), the impacts of bushmeat hunting on wildlife appear to fall into three categories (Table 3). -Large ungulate populations reduced to low densities throughout reserve, the density of small mammals has been reduced for 1-2 km from the boundary (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) Niassa (Wright et al, 2007;Brodie et al, 2009). Such impacts were recorded in 60% of case-studies (Table 3).…”
Section: Ecological Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From our sample of 25 case studies (which often incorporate multiple sites, and providing insights from 14 countries), the impacts of bushmeat hunting on wildlife appear to fall into three categories (Table 3). -Large ungulate populations reduced to low densities throughout reserve, the density of small mammals has been reduced for 1-2 km from the boundary (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) Niassa (Wright et al, 2007;Brodie et al, 2009). Such impacts were recorded in 60% of case-studies (Table 3).…”
Section: Ecological Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logging companies often perceive bushmeat as a free commodity with which to supplement workers' income (Wilkie et al, 2011). The frequency of bushmeat hunting and rate of bushmeat consumption declines with distance from human settlements (Hofer et al, (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995) ; 4 (Saru, 2012) ; 5 (Fusari and Carpaneto, 2006) ; 6 (Lindsey and Bento, 2012) 7 C. Roche, unpublished; (Warchol and Johnson, 2009) Hofer 2000, Barnett 2002, 1996Muchaal and Ngandjui, 1999;Brashares et al, 2011;Lindsey et al, 2011a) and wildlife populations fare better where human settlement is not permitted .…”
Section: Increasing Human Encroachment Of Wildlife Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is however scant information on the motives underlying these patterns and on how bushmeat hunting may be linked to other activities such as crop protection (e.g. Davies, 1990;Fitzgibbon et al, 1995;Caspary, 1999). Moreover, the role of bushmeat in household subsistence in West Africa's rural areas is not well known (Crookes et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya, and the coastal lowland forests of Kenya and Tanzania, most species of threatened forest mammals are confined to forest reserves (Burgess et al, 1998b;Burgess & Clarke, 2000). However, for larger mammals the forest reserves often afford little protection against hunting, and many of these reserves have been emptied of their larger mammal species to supply the bushmeat trade (Fa et al, 1995;Fitzgibbon et al, 1995;Wilkie & Carpenter, 1999;Oates, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%