2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3737272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsidizing Technology Competition: China’s Evolving Practices and International Trade Regulation in the Post- Pandemic Era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…China's implementation speaks against the widespread concerns about the potential difficulties of challenging Chinese subsidies due to a lack of transparency. On the contrary, most Chinese industrial subsidies take the typical forms contemplated in the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM), and it is possible for WTO Members to use the existing rules and the DSS to push China to remove or reduce these subsidies that harm their interests (Zhou and Fang, 2021). In addition, one must consider the numerous AD and CVD actions against Chinese exports, which are frequently used to address the Chinese government's intervention in the market including through subsidies (Nedumpara and Zhou, 2018).…”
Section: Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…China's implementation speaks against the widespread concerns about the potential difficulties of challenging Chinese subsidies due to a lack of transparency. On the contrary, most Chinese industrial subsidies take the typical forms contemplated in the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM), and it is possible for WTO Members to use the existing rules and the DSS to push China to remove or reduce these subsidies that harm their interests (Zhou and Fang, 2021). In addition, one must consider the numerous AD and CVD actions against Chinese exports, which are frequently used to address the Chinese government's intervention in the market including through subsidies (Nedumpara and Zhou, 2018).…”
Section: Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, while there is a longstanding and ongoing debate about the AB's 'authority-based' test for determining whether a granting entity constitutes a 'public body', this test did not prevent investigating authorities from finding Chinese state banks, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and state-invested enterprises (SIEs) as public bodies (Appellate Body Report, 2011, 2019). In addition, China's WTO-plus obligations under Section 15(b) of the Accession Protocol provide wide latitude for authorities to apply countervailing measures to address the negative effects of Chinese subsidies (Zhou and Fang, 2021).…”
Section: Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%