2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-016-9986-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsidence Modeling Validation Through Back Analysis for an Italian Gas Storage Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluid-flow and the stress-strain equations are solved separately using dedicated reservoir and geomechanical simulators. As has been discussed in the literature [8][9][10][28][29][30][31], the one-way coupling approach represents the primary method for subsidence calculation due to its relative tight computational time and easiness of application together with reliable phenomena simulation and prediction. Moreover, the geomechanical model characterization can be properly achieved via routine geotechnical laboratory analysis for strength and deformation parameters determination.…”
Section: Coupled Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid-flow and the stress-strain equations are solved separately using dedicated reservoir and geomechanical simulators. As has been discussed in the literature [8][9][10][28][29][30][31], the one-way coupling approach represents the primary method for subsidence calculation due to its relative tight computational time and easiness of application together with reliable phenomena simulation and prediction. Moreover, the geomechanical model characterization can be properly achieved via routine geotechnical laboratory analysis for strength and deformation parameters determination.…”
Section: Coupled Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static and dynamic approaches for UGS analysis follow the basic workflow of a standard reservoir study. Furthermore, rock mechanical features should also be incorporated together with the structural, sedimentological, petrophysical, and fluid-dynamic properties into the reservoir model so as to investigate not only single phenomena but also their mutual interactions through a coupled fluid-flow and stress/strain approach [66,67].…”
Section: Aquifersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the results obtained by the fluid diffusion model are applied to the geomechanical model, following a 1-way coupling strategy as is usually done in hydrogeological and petroleum engineering. [37][38][39][40] Hence, the stresses appearing in the model, and therefore in the results of the numerical simulations in the paper, are always considered effective. Depending on the constitutive law for the solid phase, the term Φ of Equation 6 is generally nonlinear.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P 0 and k are material parameters associated with the volumetric part of the deformation, while 0 is the elastic shear modulus associated with the deviatoric part. The free energy function defined in Equation 40 resembles the equation proposed originally by Houlsby 43 and then adopted by several authors [44][45][46][47] as well, mainly to describe the elastic part of the constitutive behavior of clays. With respect to the original formulation, the equation proposed in this model differs by the introduction of an additional contribution, ie, −P 0 v , which guarantees that the stress state is null in case of null strain state.…”
Section: The Pseudoelastic Constitutive Model 321 Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%