2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-013-0966-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsegmental pulmonary embolism: is the emperor still naked?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16] CTPA has become the dominant modality for diagnosing PE, with imaging rates for PE increasing well ahead of population growth, whilst the reported rate of positive scans (yield) has decreased. [2,3]ED CTPA usage has increased markedly, with EDs now often being the largest single initiator of CTPA within their hospitals. [710]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] CTPA has become the dominant modality for diagnosing PE, with imaging rates for PE increasing well ahead of population growth, whilst the reported rate of positive scans (yield) has decreased. [2,3]ED CTPA usage has increased markedly, with EDs now often being the largest single initiator of CTPA within their hospitals. [710]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recently proposed that, in addition to a currently ongoing trial on withholding anticoagulation in SSPE, a predictive score regarding SSPE risk profile could be useful in clinical decision making. 13 Other risk factors that might be associated with poor outcomes among this set of patients are the Charlson score, low albumin, and active cancer. Moreover, patients who present with SSPE after surgery (or other transient risk factor) might face lower incidence of complications during follow-up, likely due to the lower prevalence of a permanent thrombotic risk factor such as cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Second, much SSPE may be incorrectly classified (ie, false positives) due to the limitations of the diagnostic procedure. 9,12,13 We are unaware of any previous studies that have attempted to stratify the risk of poor clinical outcomes in patients with SSPE. If such a risk stratification measure was available, it could have important clinical implications for treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some studies have reported that in selected series of patients (without severe cardiovascular disease/with asymptomatic isolated sub-segmental PE), silent pulmonary embolism had a good prognosis and the anticoagulant treatment did not influence the resolution rate of PE, other authors have reported that most fatal PE are not suspected clinically and not treated, and most authors believe that occult pulmonary emboli may need to be treated even if treatment decisions are not clear [2,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Malignancy and its treatment are known risk factors for pulmonary embolism, but clinical diagnosis of PE in these patients is often difficult due to comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, cardiac failure, coronary artery disease).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%