2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.083601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subradiance in a Large Cloud of Cold Atoms

Abstract: Since Dicke's seminal paper on coherence in spontaneous radiation by atomic ensembles, superradiance has been extensively studied. Subradiance, on the contrary, has remained elusive, mainly because subradiant states are weakly coupled to the environment and are very sensitive to nonradiative decoherence processes. Here, we report the experimental observation of subradiance in an extended and dilute cold-atom sample containing a large number of particles. We use a far detuned laser to avoid multiple scattering … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
377
6
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
21
377
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our hypothesis is that there are two in principle independent dimensionless density parameters in the light-propagation problem, the on-resonance optical thickness 6πρh (6πρhk −2 in terms of full dimensional quantities) that is a MFT parameter, and the plain ρ (ρk −3 ) that governs the role of dipole-dipole interactions beyond MFT. In several recent experiments [3][4][5]10] the on-resonance optical thickness has proven to be the dimensionless parameter that governs the density dependence of the results. In contrast, our interpretation is that the nontrivial results in Fig.…”
Section: Results For the Slabmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our hypothesis is that there are two in principle independent dimensionless density parameters in the light-propagation problem, the on-resonance optical thickness 6πρh (6πρhk −2 in terms of full dimensional quantities) that is a MFT parameter, and the plain ρ (ρk −3 ) that governs the role of dipole-dipole interactions beyond MFT. In several recent experiments [3][4][5]10] the on-resonance optical thickness has proven to be the dimensionless parameter that governs the density dependence of the results. In contrast, our interpretation is that the nontrivial results in Fig.…”
Section: Results For the Slabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical thickness is a characteristic dimensionless parameter of MFT, and while MFT remains valid, optical thickness may be expected to be the dimensionless parameter. Numerous theoretical analyses are phrased in terms of optical thickness, and a scaling with optical thickness has been demonstrated in recent experiments, e.g., [3][4][5]10]. It is not a surprise that one can observe superradiance even in standard optics, and that it scales with optical thickness; optical thickness makes optical resonances broader, whereupon the conventional wisdom about Fourier transformations automatically predicts shortening time scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Starting from an independent approach, cooperative scattering in the low-intensity (or 'single-photon') regime, related to Dicke states [16], has been investigated in the mid 2000s, first from a theoretical point of view [17], followed by experiments with presently ongoing efforts in many groups [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. One result, which has been described with a cooperative scattering approach, has been the momentum transfer onto the center of mass of a cloud of cold atoms, measured via the radiation pres-scattering has been developed [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%