1989
DOI: 10.1109/34.41367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subpixel measurements using a moment-based edge operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometric moment approach developed by Lyvers [9] fits moments into 2D model of an ideal edge. This model is described by four parameters which indicate subpixel edge position.…”
Section: B Moment Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric moment approach developed by Lyvers [9] fits moments into 2D model of an ideal edge. This model is described by four parameters which indicate subpixel edge position.…”
Section: B Moment Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its uses range from edge detection [23,24,25], background normalization [26], shape [27] and surface topography [28], to image segmentation procedures involving detection of corners, curves, valleys, and ridges [29,30]. The facet model principle is based on the minimization of the error between the image thought of as a piecewise continuous gray level intensity surface and the observed data from the physical scene [31].…”
Section: Facet Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the sub-pixel method can be divided into Interpolation method (Zhang and Wu, 2006), Matrix method (Lyvers and Mitchell, 1989;Chong and Raveendran, 2003;Tabatabai and Mitchell, 1984), and Fitting method (Shang and Chen, 2011;Chong and Raveendran, 2013). Among them, Matrix method is sensitive to the image noise; Fitting method model is complex, solving slower; the accuracy of the Interpolation method is best, and the calculation is relatively least.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%