1992
DOI: 10.1137/0330065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suboptimization of Singularly Perturbed Control Systems

Abstract: Abstract. An averaging technique for nonlinear multiscale singularly perturbed control systems is developed. Issues concerning the existence and structure of limit occupational measures sets generated by such systems are discussed. General results are illustrated with special cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, as can be readily verified, Assumption 6.2(i) implies that the solutions y(τ, u(·), y 1 ) and y(τ, u(·), y 2 ) of the associated system (2. From the validity of (6.4) and (6.5) it follows that the associated system (2.11) and the averaged system (2.18) have unique forward invariant sets which also are global attractors for the solutions of these systems (see Theorem 3.1(ii) in [39]). For simplicity, we will assume that Y and Z are these sets.…”
Section: Assumption 62mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, as can be readily verified, Assumption 6.2(i) implies that the solutions y(τ, u(·), y 1 ) and y(τ, u(·), y 2 ) of the associated system (2. From the validity of (6.4) and (6.5) it follows that the associated system (2.11) and the averaged system (2.18) have unique forward invariant sets which also are global attractors for the solutions of these systems (see Theorem 3.1(ii) in [39]). For simplicity, we will assume that Y and Z are these sets.…”
Section: Assumption 62mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in [48], our consideration is based on earlier results on averaging of SP control systems obtained in [39], [41], [42], [44], [47] (see also [6], [7], [8], [10], [51], [52], [67]) and on results obtained in [35], [45], [46], [47] that establish the equivalence of optimal control problems to certain infinite dimensional (ID) linear programming (LP) problems (related results on IDLP formulations of optimal control problems in both deterministic and stochastic settings can be found in [5], [15], [16], [21], [31], [37], [50], [53], [57], [60], [69], [71], [72] and [76]). In contrast to [48], where mostly optimal control problems with time discounting criteria were dealt with, this paper is devoted to the consideration of the problems with long run average optimality criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We emphasize that, in general, the averaged system is set-valued. We refer the reader to [14,20] for averaging methods. It is important to notice that only the behavior of the "slow" variable X x;y;u ;" ( ) is concerned by this approach.…”
Section: Singularly Perturbed Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, these criteria involve Pontryagin's maximum principle which is di¢cult to study if one does not fully understand the averaged dynamics. We recall [12,13,14] and references therein dealing with this kind of problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%