2023
DOI: 10.3150/22-bej1465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suboptimality of constrained least squares and improvements via non-linear predictors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We focus on the sharp analysis of ERM in a convex reference set W. Nevertheless, recent work has demonstrated that the use of so-called improper estimators -estimators that predict values outside of the reference set W -can lead to significant improvements in the dependence on some parameters. These estimators are typically based on aggregating the functions within certain non-convex reference sets constructed by truncating the original functions that correspond to W. Such improvements are known in both logistic regression (Kakade and Ng, 2004;Foster et al, 2018;Mourtada and Gaïffas, 2022) and regression with the squared loss (Forster and Warmuth, 2002;Vaškevičius and Zhivotovskiy, 2023;Mourtada et al, 2021). However, it should be noted that the improper learning setup poses a considerable challenge for the localized analysis utilized in this paper.…”
Section: Main Results and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on the sharp analysis of ERM in a convex reference set W. Nevertheless, recent work has demonstrated that the use of so-called improper estimators -estimators that predict values outside of the reference set W -can lead to significant improvements in the dependence on some parameters. These estimators are typically based on aggregating the functions within certain non-convex reference sets constructed by truncating the original functions that correspond to W. Such improvements are known in both logistic regression (Kakade and Ng, 2004;Foster et al, 2018;Mourtada and Gaïffas, 2022) and regression with the squared loss (Forster and Warmuth, 2002;Vaškevičius and Zhivotovskiy, 2023;Mourtada et al, 2021). However, it should be noted that the improper learning setup poses a considerable challenge for the localized analysis utilized in this paper.…”
Section: Main Results and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%