2010
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suboptimal Contrast Opacification of Dynamic Head and Neck MR Angiography due to Venous Stasis and Reflux: Technical Considerations for Optimization

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced head and neck MRA may be degraded by venous stasis and reflux of contrast into the jugular veins. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between venous stasis and reflux and the side of injection and other causal factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vascular contrast results from the T1-shortening effects of gadolinium on adjacent water protons and has relatively little dependence on inflow effects. In contrast to MRA, the limitation of CE MRV is that maximal contrast enhancement achieved in veins is typically lower than arteries because the contrast bolus is more dilute by the time it reaches the venous system [126]. To improve background suppression and emphasize vascular signal, fat saturation can be added to a 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequence with a small increase in acquisition time.…”
Section: Noninvasive Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vascular contrast results from the T1-shortening effects of gadolinium on adjacent water protons and has relatively little dependence on inflow effects. In contrast to MRA, the limitation of CE MRV is that maximal contrast enhancement achieved in veins is typically lower than arteries because the contrast bolus is more dilute by the time it reaches the venous system [126]. To improve background suppression and emphasize vascular signal, fat saturation can be added to a 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequence with a small increase in acquisition time.…”
Section: Noninvasive Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the vast amount of literature that has been accumulated on X‐ray angiography over the past 95 years, to our knowledge, little‐to‐nothing has been done to understand the hemodynamics underlying contrast reflux. In general, reflux has only been viewed as an excess of contrast volume that does not contribute to, or even degrades, image quality by contrast density artifacts and delayed time of arrival of contrast to the region of interest 1–3 . Power injection systems and contrast volume monitors have been developed to reduce the excess of contrast that refluxes instead of filling the vascular region of interest, with the intention of reducing contrast‐induced acute kidney injury in patients 4–6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, reflux has only been viewed as an excess of contrast volume that does not contribute to, or even degrades, image quality by contrast density artifacts and delayed time of arrival of contrast to the region of interest. [1][2][3] Power injection systems and contrast volume monitors have been developed to reduce the excess of contrast that refluxes instead of filling the vascular region of interest, with the intention of reducing contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients. [4][5][6] The extent of contrast reflux (usually graded by a semiquantitative score) 7 has been used as an indication of disease severity because the disease results in altered hemodynamics that are observed as reflux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%