“…Hence, only the study [14] with the longer time interval was included in our review and the other study [24] was excluded to avoid duplication of data. Of the remaining 16 studies, three were case reports [13,16,22], nine were retrospective studies [8,11,12,14,15,17-19,21] and four were prospective studies [9,10,20,23]. All studies except two [16,23] were conducted in China [8-15,17-22], which could have led to bias in our results.…”