1999
DOI: 10.1006/icar.1999.6160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submillimeter-Scale Topography of the Lunar Regolith

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
126
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
12
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6) and Diviner daytime measurements in channels 3 and 6 (12.5-25 mm) to determine the spectral aniosthermality caused by surface roughness at Reiner Gamma. Surface roughness varies with length scale, and becomes greater with decreasing scale 29 . Previous lunar surface roughness estimates have included Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter data at metre to decametre scales 30 , visible photometric studies typically at sub-mm scales 31,32 and additional sub-mm surface roughness estimates from in situ high-resolution imagery 29 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) and Diviner daytime measurements in channels 3 and 6 (12.5-25 mm) to determine the spectral aniosthermality caused by surface roughness at Reiner Gamma. Surface roughness varies with length scale, and becomes greater with decreasing scale 29 . Previous lunar surface roughness estimates have included Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter data at metre to decametre scales 30 , visible photometric studies typically at sub-mm scales 31,32 and additional sub-mm surface roughness estimates from in situ high-resolution imagery 29 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haldemann el al. (1997, personal communication) found H -0.5 for the terrain around the Mars Pathfinder landing site at scales of centimeters to tens of meters, while Helfenstein and Shepard (1999) report H values of 0.54.7 for undisturbed lunar regolith at scales of submillimeters to centimeters.…”
Section: J~tstifica~ion For-assumplion Of Self-affine Behavior-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shepard and Campbell (1998) argued that the photometric roughness measured byθ is dominated by the smallest size scale for which shadows still exist -which is a few times the wavelength of incident radiation if diffraction dominates shadow removal (∼ 1 μm), although it could be substantially larger (centimeters) if shadows are removed by efficient multiple scattering (a mechanism which decreases in importance when A v is reduced). In this context it is interesting that < ∼ 5% of the roughness measured for lunar regolith originates from topographic features larger than ∼ 8 cm according to Helfenstein and Shepard (1999). In their laboratory investigation of regolith analogues, Cord et al (2003) found thatθ primarily was determined by roughness on the sub-mm to cm level.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%