2007
DOI: 10.7202/032756ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submarine Slope Stability of a Fjord Delta: Bella Coola, British Columbia

Abstract: Recent evidence indicates that the submarine slopes of the Bella Coola Delta, a fjord delta in British Columbia, are subject to mass movements. Mass movements originate in the source areas of chutes (gullies) and transfer coarse sediment downslope. Stability analyses indicate that earthquakes, depositional loading and wave loading are capable of causing slope failures in chute source areas. Gas generation and tidal drawdown appear to reduce sediment strength by increasing pore water pressures, increasing the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CUBs in the Ilias bottomsets are interpreted as coarse‐grained base‐of‐foreset lobes, similar to those described as ‘sandy lobes’, ‘fjord bottom splays’, or ‘tongues’ in bathymetric datasets of deltaic systems (Kostaschuk & McCann, ; Postma & Cruickshank, ; Prior & Bornhold, ; Prior, Wiseman, & Bryant, ). This interpretation is supported by their position downdip of conglomerate‐filled megascours, and incorporation of large sedimentary intraclasts.…”
Section: Structure and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CUBs in the Ilias bottomsets are interpreted as coarse‐grained base‐of‐foreset lobes, similar to those described as ‘sandy lobes’, ‘fjord bottom splays’, or ‘tongues’ in bathymetric datasets of deltaic systems (Kostaschuk & McCann, ; Postma & Cruickshank, ; Prior & Bornhold, ; Prior, Wiseman, & Bryant, ). This interpretation is supported by their position downdip of conglomerate‐filled megascours, and incorporation of large sedimentary intraclasts.…”
Section: Structure and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The lenticular bodies are interpreted as channel‐fills with geometries and dimensions similar to chutes reported from bathymetric datasets on modern delta foresets and bottomsets (e.g. Kostaschuk & McCann, ; Prior et al, ). They are likely formed by erosive flows that left behind coarse‐grained lag deposits.…”
Section: Structure and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The geometries, sedimentary processes and stratigraphic architectures in topsets and foresets are well known (e.g. Prior, 1981;Lowe, 1982;Postma, 1984a, b;Bornhold and Prior, 1988;Massari and Colella, 1988; Kostaschuk and McCann, 1989;Nemec, 1990;Horton and Schmitt, 1996;Massari, 1996;Breda et al, 2007;Rohais et al, 2008). Conversely, toesets and bottomsets are poorly charaterized and constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclination of the dominant facies of the SL1 facies association is attributed to a sedimentary dip rather than a tectonic tilting, given their association with numerous gravity-flow deposits, the absence of faults (either syn-sedimentary or post-depositional), and their observation at both the large (i.e., outcrops) and small scale (i.e., cores). The sedimentary dip, together with the dominant facies reflecting high sedimentary fluxes alternating with phases of settling of fine-grained particles, and with the turbidite and the debris flow deposits, likely indicate deltaic foresets (e.g., Lowe 1982;Postma 1984;Colella et al 1987;Kostaschuk and McCann 1989;Nemec 1990;Massari 1996;Breda et al 2007;Rubi et al 2018) that are prograding into a sublittoral lake environment (Table 2).…”
Section: Facies Association Sl1mentioning
confidence: 99%