2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20979-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submarine Landslides and Incised Canyons of the Southeast Queensland Continental Margin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of interest to note that an enormous coherent olistostromic block of similar size (20 km in lateral extent and at least 500 m thick) has been identified in the Neogene abyssal plain sediment sequence of the northern Tasman Sea Basin and that this allocthonous block is interpreted to be the product of single submarine landslide event that removed the majority of the continental slope (cf. Hill, 1992;Hubble et al, 2016). Our proposed Narooma allochthone is surrounded by Adaminaby Group turbidites equivalent in age to part of the lower Narooma Chert.…”
Section: Naroomamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is of interest to note that an enormous coherent olistostromic block of similar size (20 km in lateral extent and at least 500 m thick) has been identified in the Neogene abyssal plain sediment sequence of the northern Tasman Sea Basin and that this allocthonous block is interpreted to be the product of single submarine landslide event that removed the majority of the continental slope (cf. Hill, 1992;Hubble et al, 2016). Our proposed Narooma allochthone is surrounded by Adaminaby Group turbidites equivalent in age to part of the lower Narooma Chert.…”
Section: Naroomamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If the rates were representative or similar to the long-term Neogene average surface accumulation then sediment removal has been a consistently occurring event since the formation of the margin at 60 Ma. Given that the sediment wedge deposit is generally less than 500 m thick (Boyd et al, 2004(Boyd et al, , 2010 and there is abundant evidence for submarine landsliding (Boyd et al, 2010;Clarke et al, 2012;Hubble et al, 2012;Hubble et al 2016;and this work) then it follows that the main mechanism for sediment removal on this section of the margin is the eastern Australian current and mass wasting. Assuming constant sedimentation rates of between 0.02-0.20 mka -1 on the margin since its formation, a sediment deposit between ~1-3 km is "missing" from the margin, suggesting that much of the sediment has moved off the shelf and slope and down to the abyssal plain.…”
Section: Troedson and Daviesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, increased groundwater flows from underlying rocks could contribute to reduced strength. It has also been suggested (Hubble et al, , 2016) that changes to ocean currents associated with glaciations can contribute to toe erosion and slope over-steepening. 14 C ages determined for sediment sampled directly above the boundary surfaces do not appear to correlate sliding with any one particular sea-level event (Figure 15b).…”
Section: Possible Triggersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations