1958
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1958)69[967:saawp]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Submarine Abrasion and Wave-Cut Platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where the bench is covered with detritus, the lag can often be found by coring. Although previous studies have placed the mean water level at or well above the base of the bluff (e.g., Johnson 1919; Dietz and Menard 1951;Bradley 1958;Rovey and Borucki 1994), we suggest that the bouldery lag at the bluff base provides the most credible estimation of mean water level (Johnson 1933b;Miller 1939;Zenkovich 1967;Steers 1969). Our observations of modern Great Lakes shorelines also support the use of this position as a surrogate for previous water planes.…”
Section: Water-plane Estimationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Where the bench is covered with detritus, the lag can often be found by coring. Although previous studies have placed the mean water level at or well above the base of the bluff (e.g., Johnson 1919; Dietz and Menard 1951;Bradley 1958;Rovey and Borucki 1994), we suggest that the bouldery lag at the bluff base provides the most credible estimation of mean water level (Johnson 1933b;Miller 1939;Zenkovich 1967;Steers 1969). Our observations of modern Great Lakes shorelines also support the use of this position as a surrogate for previous water planes.…”
Section: Water-plane Estimationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The inner edge of the terrace is defined by a shoreline angle at 58 m below present sea level and the outer edge is defined by the shelf break. Although the terrace angle has not been dated, it is inferred from the terrace's configuration that it formed during a slow rise of sea level relative to the rate of sedimentation, perhaps followed by a stillstand near 58 m below present sea level (15). Landward of the shoreline angle, the dip of the Pleistocene/Holocene unconformity increases to as much as 100 and is truncated by a younger erosional surface at 24 m below present sea level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erosion and platform cutting are assumed to be achieved solely by wave action on the shoreline, especially in the breaking zone (Bradley, 1958;Dietz, 1963), and we consider initially wave-induced abrasion, or the down wearing of the wave cut platform and not the effect of cliff retreat on profile development and volume of sediment eroded. The principle of uniformitarianism is accepted in the sense that erosion rates are assumed similar through time.…”
Section: Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%