2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00453-019-00656-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sublinear-Space and Bounded-Delay Algorithms for Maximal Clique Enumeration in Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an algorithm is bound to use an amount of memory that is exponential in the size of r. This is due to the fact that some databases have exponentially many minimal solutions and the decision subroutine at least has to read all of H. Note that such a large memory consumption is not at all necessary as there are algorithms known for Transversal Hypergraph whose space complexity is only linear in the input size [27,39]. In fact, enumeration algorithms are often analyzed not only with respect to their running time, but also in terms of space consumption, see [9,14]. For data profiling problems like Enumerate Minimal UCCs on the other hand, space-efficient algorithms have only recently started to received some attention [5,6,36].…”
Section: Approximation and Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an algorithm is bound to use an amount of memory that is exponential in the size of r. This is due to the fact that some databases have exponentially many minimal solutions and the decision subroutine at least has to read all of H. Note that such a large memory consumption is not at all necessary as there are algorithms known for Transversal Hypergraph whose space complexity is only linear in the input size [27,39]. In fact, enumeration algorithms are often analyzed not only with respect to their running time, but also in terms of space consumption, see [9,14]. For data profiling problems like Enumerate Minimal UCCs on the other hand, space-efficient algorithms have only recently started to received some attention [5,6,36].…”
Section: Approximation and Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It defines a "successor" function to traverse from one solution to the others, which corresponds to a DFS on an implicit solution graph where the nodes represent desired subgraphs and the links capture the traversals from desired subgraphs to other desired subgraphs. Recently, this framework has been adopted to solve various enumeration problems, e.g., independent sets [11,40], cliques [7,12,32], 𝑘-plexes [4], and general structures that satisfy the hereditary property [6,10,14]. The algorithms following this framework achieve an output-sensitive time complexity that is proportional to the number of desired subgraphs (within the input graph).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it seems relevant to find nice parameters of the graph to get tractable complexities. There has been a long line of work following this approach and such results can be found in [2,3,4,5,8,10,11,14] for instance. The parameters used in these papers often try to capture the sparseness of the input graph, since many real words graphs have, in fact, few edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%