2016 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/allerton.2016.7852323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sublinear estimation of a single element in sparse linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 , which by Lemma 16 with probability 1 − δ 2 is within a multiplicative (1 ± ǫ) of its own expectation for all u ∈ B. We thus get a multiplicative (1±ǫ)-approximation of the rightmost summation in Equation 53, while for the remaining terms we use the concentration bounds of Subsection A.12.5, as for PageRank.…”
Section: A122 Subgraph Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 , which by Lemma 16 with probability 1 − δ 2 is within a multiplicative (1 ± ǫ) of its own expectation for all u ∈ B. We thus get a multiplicative (1±ǫ)-approximation of the rightmost summation in Equation 53, while for the remaining terms we use the concentration bounds of Subsection A.12.5, as for PageRank.…”
Section: A122 Subgraph Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, we shall mention recent work on the local approximation of the stationary probability of a target state v in a Markov Chain [44,8,18], and on the local approximation of a single entry of the solution vector of a linear system [45,53]. The local approximation of P (v) is a specific but nontrivial case of both, and we hope that our techniques may serve as an entry point for future developments in those directions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been independently studied for the specific setting of computing Pagerank, Andersen et al proposed an iterative method which relies on the conditions that G is a nonnegative scaled stochastic matrix, z is entry-wise positive and bounded strictly away from zero, and the solution x is a probability vector (i.e., consisting of nonnegative entries that sum to 1) [23]. There has been subsequent follow up work which builds upon an earlier version of our paper to design bidirectional local algorithms that combine both iterative algorithms and Monte Carlo methods [24], [25].…”
Section: Local Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…into(25) to show thatEP r (t+1) 2 (t) = r (t)T I − 2I−G−G T −D min(td,n) r (t) . (29)We substitute(29) and Lemma 11.1a into(24) to show thatEP r (t+1) − EP r (t+1) 2 (t) ,= r (t)T I − 2I−G−G T −D min(td,n) T min(td,n) r (t) , = r (t)T D min(td,n) − (I−G)(I−G T ) min(td,n) 2 r (t) , ≤ D min(td,n) − (I−G)(I−G T ) min(td,n) 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…via the power method [10], can be simply infeasible. As an alternative one can then resort to approximating only individual entries of the vector, in exchange for a much lower computational complexity [13,20]. In fact, if such a complexity is low enough one could efficiently "sketch" the whole vector by quickly getting a fair estimate of its entries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%