2021
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subliminal perception is continuous with conscious vision and can be predicted from prestimulus electroencephalographic activity

Abstract: Individuals are able to discriminate visual stimuli they report not consciously seeing. This phenomenon is known as “subliminal perception.” Such capacity is often assumed to be relatively automatic in nature and rely on stimulus‐driven activity in low‐level cortical areas. Instead, here we asked to what extent neural activity before stimulus presentation influences subliminal perception. We asked participants to discriminate the location of a briefly presented low‐contrast visual stimulus and then rate how we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with research on “unconscious” saccadic reactions in monkeys (Isa & Yoshida, 2021; Yoshida & Isa, 2015). Similar correlation with conscious perceptual sensitivity and alleged “unconscious” perception have also been reported previously (Koivisto et al, 2021; Railo et al, 2021). Interestingly, similar pattern was not observed in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is consistent with research on “unconscious” saccadic reactions in monkeys (Isa & Yoshida, 2021; Yoshida & Isa, 2015). Similar correlation with conscious perceptual sensitivity and alleged “unconscious” perception have also been reported previously (Koivisto et al, 2021; Railo et al, 2021). Interestingly, similar pattern was not observed in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Pre-stimulus brain activity also modifies perceptual (van Dijk et al, 2008) and pain (Taesler and Rose, 2016) thresholds. Therefore, depending on the pre-stimulus activity, decisions can be made, even in the absence of actual evidence (Barik et al, 2019; Wöstmann et al, 2019), or under ambiguous evidence (Rassi et al, 2019; Railo et al, 2021). Along the same lines, Kloosterman et al (2019) have shown that biases were implemented through local changes in accumulation rate, which supports the intertwining of accumulation rate and pre-stimulus states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reporting a perceptual experience without controlling or measuring the response criterion could overestimate the unconscious processing (i.e., conservative response criterion; Finkbeiner & Coltheart, 2014) because under limited visibility conditions there could be a tendency to report the absence of an experience. Future studies should employ and report signal detection measures of criterion or bias (Stanislaw & Todorov, 1999) and the relationship with task accuracy (e.g., Railo et al, 2021) in order to understand a possible moderator or confound of the unconscious effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%