2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subliminal exposure to faces and racial attitudes: Exposure to Whites makes Whites like Blacks less

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
36
2
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
36
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Monahan and colleagues termed this phenomenon the Mere Exposure Effect. Recent research about emotions induced by subliminal stimulus from the Mere Exposure Effect has been applied to research on racial attitude (Smith, Dijksterhuis, & Chalken, 2008). However, some researchers (Berridge & Winkielman, 2003;Winkielman & Berridge, 2004) argued that emotion induced by a subliminal stimulus was not necessarily implicit emotion, because sometimes an individual could be aware of the emotion induced by the subliminal stimulus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monahan and colleagues termed this phenomenon the Mere Exposure Effect. Recent research about emotions induced by subliminal stimulus from the Mere Exposure Effect has been applied to research on racial attitude (Smith, Dijksterhuis, & Chalken, 2008). However, some researchers (Berridge & Winkielman, 2003;Winkielman & Berridge, 2004) argued that emotion induced by a subliminal stimulus was not necessarily implicit emotion, because sometimes an individual could be aware of the emotion induced by the subliminal stimulus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the incongruent block, participants were instructed to press the left-arrow key whenever a nonself or dominant word appeared, and the right-arrow key whenever a self or subordinate word appeared. Due to our limited participant pool, and our interest in relative differences in IAT effects between conditions rather than absolute effects (Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2005), the order of blocks was held constant: the congruent block always preceded the incongruent block (see also Smith, Dijksterhuis, & Chaiken, 2008). The IAT effect here represents participants' relative ability to associate the self (versus others) with being dominant (versus subordinate).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the mere exposure effect, only a few studies have focused on differences between implicit and explicit attitudes (e.g., Kawakami, 2012;Smith, Dijksterhuis, & Chaiken, 2008). This work has demonstrated that when stimuli are presented subliminally, changes occur in implicit but not explicit attitudes.…”
Section: Implicit and Explicit Attitude Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%