Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The dynamic of early versus late twentieth-century perspectives on Othello is a signal instance of what anthropologists call ethnocentrism, defined by Berry and his colleagues (1992) as follows: “us better—them worse” (8). For the early twentieth-century scholars, Europe was self-evidently better, and clearly the non-European was worse; for the late twentieth century, the European was worse, and clearly the non-European, absent the imposition of European hegemony, was infinitely better. In practice, the earlier critics assume that Iago is right in denigrating Othello, while the later critics assert that Shakespeare himself, with or without volition, in effect takes Iago's perspective as well. In the cross chatter between those two poles, critical discourse ceases to be about the play and instead turns to arguing for an ethnocentric point of view. In this paper, then, I pay attention to Othello himself and to his insertion into Venice. To frame him and his activities, I deploy ideas derived from the field of cross-cultural psychology. My thesis is that Othello is undone, not by some grand hegemonic discourse of early European colonialism, but by the dynamic of immigrant acculturation.
The dynamic of early versus late twentieth-century perspectives on Othello is a signal instance of what anthropologists call ethnocentrism, defined by Berry and his colleagues (1992) as follows: “us better—them worse” (8). For the early twentieth-century scholars, Europe was self-evidently better, and clearly the non-European was worse; for the late twentieth century, the European was worse, and clearly the non-European, absent the imposition of European hegemony, was infinitely better. In practice, the earlier critics assume that Iago is right in denigrating Othello, while the later critics assert that Shakespeare himself, with or without volition, in effect takes Iago's perspective as well. In the cross chatter between those two poles, critical discourse ceases to be about the play and instead turns to arguing for an ethnocentric point of view. In this paper, then, I pay attention to Othello himself and to his insertion into Venice. To frame him and his activities, I deploy ideas derived from the field of cross-cultural psychology. My thesis is that Othello is undone, not by some grand hegemonic discourse of early European colonialism, but by the dynamic of immigrant acculturation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.