2021
DOI: 10.1177/1098214020921954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Well-Being, Critical Race Theory, and the Assessment of Measurement Invariance Across Racial Groups

Abstract: The present study explores how Black and White youth respond to measures of subjective well-being within the context of critical race theory (CRT). Three levels of measurement invariance (i.e., configural, metric and scalar) were examined for indicators of subjective well-being. We hypothesized that there would be limited measurement invariance across groups based on the premise established by CRT that youth of color experience and perceive life differently than their White peers, which was supported. The find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When these measures are used to make meaningful comparisons between individuals or socio-economic groups or across time points, a key assumption is the measurement invariance property, that is, the same underlying construct is measured across groups or time (Vandenberg and Lance, 2000). However, the same question/item can be understood in different ways by people from different cultural contexts (Curtis et al, 2021). Important intergroup differences in the survey responses could also reflect such differences in the interpretation of the question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these measures are used to make meaningful comparisons between individuals or socio-economic groups or across time points, a key assumption is the measurement invariance property, that is, the same underlying construct is measured across groups or time (Vandenberg and Lance, 2000). However, the same question/item can be understood in different ways by people from different cultural contexts (Curtis et al, 2021). Important intergroup differences in the survey responses could also reflect such differences in the interpretation of the question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%