Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective well-being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
67
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We use two distinct geographic areas-ZIP code and Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)-to explore whether our explanatory channels vary with reference-group proximity. 2 1 Recent research finds that while SWB cannot be considered a proxy for utility, insofar as people do not exclusively make choices to maximize it, it can be considered a "uniquely important argument of the utility function" (Benjamin et al, 2012) (see also Angner (2010) and Benjamin et al (2014)). The outcome variable in our theoretical framework is utility, and we use SWB as a proxy for it in the empirical analysis, recognizing its shortcomings as such.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use two distinct geographic areas-ZIP code and Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)-to explore whether our explanatory channels vary with reference-group proximity. 2 1 Recent research finds that while SWB cannot be considered a proxy for utility, insofar as people do not exclusively make choices to maximize it, it can be considered a "uniquely important argument of the utility function" (Benjamin et al, 2012) (see also Angner (2010) and Benjamin et al (2014)). The outcome variable in our theoretical framework is utility, and we use SWB as a proxy for it in the empirical analysis, recognizing its shortcomings as such.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La literatura sostiene que los países que presentan mayores niveles de bienestar subjetivo en sus poblaciones corresponden a aquellos que rescatan culturas más igualitarias, que enfatizan la autonomía individual, los valores post-materiales y el individualismo expresivo, caracterizándose por rasgos políticos más cercanos a la democracia y la tolerancia 1,[5][6][7] . En cuanto concepto, el bienestar subjetivo se refiere a las evaluaciones -tanto positivas como negativas-que las personas efectúan sobre su vida 8,9 . En este marco, es posible distinguir dos principales componentes 10 : el primero corresponde al eudaimonismo, que refiere a la autorrealización de los individuos.…”
unclassified
“…Although differences exist among scholars regarding a precise definition of QoL, as it is a multifaceted construct that involves a variety of issues, indicators, and measures (Angner, 2010;Kruger et al, 2013), a growing consensus associates QoL with an individual's subjective evaluation of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with his/her life (Liburd and Derkzen, 2009;Kruger et al, 2013;Dolnicar et al, 2012). The term is often used interchangeably with subjective measures for well-being, life satisfaction, and happiness (Liburd and Derkzen, 2009;Kruger et al, 2013).…”
Section: A Cultural Capital and Qolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a departure from the hedonic understanding of well-being that emphasizes feelings of pleasure or happiness (Ballantyne et al, 2014). Eudaimonic understanding emphasizes satisfaction originating with personal preferences to achieve QoL, suggesting that individuals experience a sense of well-being when their subjective preferences are satisfied or their desires are fulfilled (Scanlon, 1993;Angner, 2010). Accordingly, a person's QoL depends not only on the changes in that person's states of consciousness but also on the extent to which that person's preferences are satisfied or not (Scanlon, 1993, p. 186).…”
Section: A Cultural Capital and Qolmentioning
confidence: 99%