2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0012162205000526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective quality of life in children with intellectual impairment – how can it be assessed?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are limitations to the ''accuracy'' of parents as proxy responders. Parents may underestimate their child's subjective QOL [32]. Agreement is strongest for physical well-being, but less robust for psychosocial well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limitations to the ''accuracy'' of parents as proxy responders. Parents may underestimate their child's subjective QOL [32]. Agreement is strongest for physical well-being, but less robust for psychosocial well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 6. Impairment: walking ability described by gross motor function 17 ; fine motor function 18 ; seizures; feeding; communication; intellectual ability 19 ; and CP type. 7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually the patient and his/her caregiver(s) are the best judges of the severity of the impairments accompanying spasticity, as they are the only people who can assess its impact on the daily life of the patient [33]. Caregivers of children with profound impairments note changes in function far more accurately than staff workers [34]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%