Rail Human Factors 2013
DOI: 10.1201/b13827-84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective mental workload of Dutch train dispatchers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mental workload can be assessed by specific subjective scales. The IWS is a self-rating tool to assess mental workload in real-world settings, and it is sensitive to several environmental and task-related factors in railway industry (Pickup et al, 2005[ 28 ]; Wilms and Zeilstra 2013[ 34 ]). In these methods, operators are able to rate work demands themselves on a numerical or graphical scale (Young et al, 2015[ 39 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mental workload can be assessed by specific subjective scales. The IWS is a self-rating tool to assess mental workload in real-world settings, and it is sensitive to several environmental and task-related factors in railway industry (Pickup et al, 2005[ 28 ]; Wilms and Zeilstra 2013[ 34 ]). In these methods, operators are able to rate work demands themselves on a numerical or graphical scale (Young et al, 2015[ 39 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calibrate their scoring in order to combine it with the scoring of other signalers. Wilms & Zeilstra [14] have calibrated only with a quiet period rather than a rush hour situation. We propose to extend the calibration to two situations: the quiet period and rush hour.…”
Section: External Cognitive Task Load (Xtl)mentioning
confidence: 99%